what to do with angry cop

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

txsportsscribe

Active Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2005
Messages
4,221
could use a little advice on a recent incident with a local cop. what would be the best course of action to take when a cop verbally assaults you, threatens you and then tries to intimidate you when you go to file a complaint?

here's the gist:

i complained in an email to several of his superiors (and city administration) about ongoing lack of cooperation from the public information officer for the department. i then get a call from the cop who's rude from the get-go (which i can handle). but he quickly loses his temper - and i mean out-of-control, violently angry – and starts calling me every name in the book and tells me to bring my mother-effing fat ass down to the station he'd do something out it. i hang up and go first to a city administrator, who tells me to go to the cop's supervisor.

when i go to the police department, i specifically tell the lieutenant i do not want to see this cop and am assured that he won't be coming out. the next thing i know, here comes the angry cop to confront me. i tell him i have no intention of speaking with him and he tells me "well you got me, so deal with it."

i start to leave after another confrontation with him right there in the lobby but the initial lieutenant comes back out and asks me to wait so the angry cop's captain can speak with me. the captain - who witnessed the meeting in the lobby (and did nothing to stop it) and also witnessed angry cop's telephone tirade acknowledges that the conduct was unprofessional, apologizes and gives me an internal complaint form to fill out and return. the captain also says that while he witnessed the initial phone rant, he didn't hear any threats. to which i replied that i believe that if i felt threatened by angry cop's actions, it's a threat and that daring me to come down to the stage and he'd do something about it is an obvious threat. and also that angry cop confronting me there was nothing more than intimidation by a public official.

i now no longer feel comfortable going to city hall in my reporting duties and actually fell uneasy about even being out and about in my own city because a crazy cop with a gun has threatened me. i'm also concerned about harassment by other cops.

if it were just a pissed off cop, i could deal with that because i'm a big boy and understand some people are just pricks. but this man lost control of his ability to act rationally and with that kind of flash anger and hostility, i honestly believe he could pose a threat to the public.
 
What have your supervisors advised? IMO they need to know about this.
 
That's some serious stuff right there.

If in deed your employer has no way to back you up -- I find this hard to believe; is there no owner? Does he not have an attorney? -- then I would reach out to someone or some entity outside of the police department. Either the city manager, or the county attorney/DA.

Sounds like the department is rogue...which sounds like there are good stories to be had, because surely that cop acts that way to many other citizens.
 
i am the boss. it's a website (basically an online newspaper) that has been received very favorably in the community and we already slobberknock the weekly dead tree publication and the big metro's section coverage of our market, both in terms of coverage and readership. left the print newspaper biz behind to start this website. it's a slippery slope trying to balance the politics of being publisher with the editorial side of things. did have a city councilman call me and offer his support.

i just can't see how the police think angry cop's actions weren't criminal instead of just something for internal matters. if i had done to angry cop what he did to me, they would've had a cop at my house in 5 minutes and me in handcuffs.
 
Well, your situation does put you in a precarious position.

Maybe what I might do is let it go, so far as the cop's treatment of me. But what I would do is ask to see all the complaints from citizens filed against the department in the past few years; I imagine these are public records, even in Texas. Then, I would track down the complainers and write stories based on what happened to them. In other words, use what happened to you as the anonymous tip, so to speak, that the department is rogue. Then go about trying to prove that, like any good journalist would.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Document everything. Record all future interactions you have with this police officer, his superiors and his colleagues. Retain a lawyer. Put the city councilman on speed dial. FOIA anything you think might be interesting.

Then hope for the best.
 
images
 
reformedhack said:
Document everything. Record all future interactions you have with this police officer, his superiors and his colleagues. Retain a lawyer. Put the city councilman on speed dial. FOIA anything you think might be interesting.

Then hope for the best.
Watch you back buddy. You could be an accident at any given moment.
 
There are very, very few things worth getting into an ongoing war with a small-town cop over. Apologize to him for whatever he thinks you did.
 
Drip said:
Watch you back buddy. You could be an accident at any given moment.

If that's truly a risk, it's already in play at this point, so now it's really just a matter of keeping a paper trail for whatever purpose necessary.
 
not a small town. 140,000 population suburb. and to think you would apologize for trying to do your job simply amazes me.
 
open records request everything you can think of

Contact local public defender/legal aid. They have dealt with this guy before and may have a huge file on him. Best 2-3 local private criminal attorneys in town--same thing.

Good luck.
 
What Rick Stain said. Also: How long have you covered police news? And how do you define ongoing lack of cooperation? Sometimes cops come off as uncooperative when they — for legal reasons — can't share information. It takes a long time to build trust with police sources, imho, longer than most other sources. Since you are your own boss, I would suggest finding a way to sit down with the PIO and his Lt. or Capt. and find some common ground.
 
the p.i.o. is the angry cop. i've covered a lot of cops/crime in two decades of newspaper work. it's not a case of sharing info at all, it's a case of selectively sharing info. i call about something and am told "it's our policy not to discuss ...." and then turn around and see the same p.i.o. quoted elsewhere on the very info i was seeking. or simple things that i've never had a problem getting from multiple other police organizations (larger and smaller) in the past is greeted here by "you'll need to file an open records request."

the gist of the problem was that i complained above him in an email that i deserved a level playing field when it came to releasing info and he apparently didn't like that fact so he went bat-**** crazy.

he's actually the assistant p.i.o but the regular one has been on extended leave for "personal reasons" that, if i were to guess, is nothing more than him eating up sick time before he retires in 2013. but, set aside the anger issues from his stand-in, he wasn't much better as far as releasing info. oh sure, he'd cooperate to no end when it comes to a fluff piece, but crime? nope.

appreciate the feedback, though, and filing it away.

on the positive side, one respected city councilman has reached out to me to offer support - in this particular incident, as well as the level playing field when providing info. this councilman sees our efforts and appreciates the balanced reporting and lack of incorrect info and errors they were used to seeing from the weekly dead tree. some in the city offices haven't even taken the time to see that we're not a blog with an agenda putting out opinion-based crap that they call reporting. heck, we don't even have columns or editorials, just your basic news, high school sports, schools, community, features.

and on the very positive side, residents have really taken a liking to us so that's my real position of strength. the weekly (which i don't even see as competition anymore) usually has about a dozen local stories a week compared to our 40-50 and we update on a daily basis for the most part. we've developed a very loyal readership simply because we do good work and the previous alternative was the dead tree that no longer even has an office here. they're part of a chain that really doesn't take an interest in the communities they cover other than to fit copy into the white space surrounding their dwindling ads.

but again, appreciate the feedback.
 
also, don't want to put out the impression that i'm anti-weekly or anti-dead tree. far from it. there are actually some very good weeklies out there. our non-compeition just isn't one of them. and as a person who worked at newspapers for two decades, it really was emotionally difficult to go online only with this venture.
 
I'd be interested in hearing the captain's explanation what the "bring your MF-ing fat ass down there and he will do" whatever means, if it is not a threat. I'd ask in writing, and cc everyone above this officer and the captain in the department, the city manager, everyone on the council and everyone in the DA's office, too.

If you have an attorney and he/she sends the letter on your behalf, even better.

That's a threat, pure and simple, and the more people know about it, the better off you will be.
 
Not to threadjack, but I am hearing a lot of online publications are being treated poorly (not this poorly, though) by law enforcement/government officials who don't see them as "real" media.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top