Waking Ned lamont

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

terrier said:
Lieberman only has himself to blame for the Lamont phenomenon getting as far as it did.

Yeah, gee, it's going to be a ***** being back in the Senate with both parties wanting your help for the next six years. Please don't throw me in that there briar patch.
 
hondo said:
terrier said:
Think of how this race embarasses the GOP. That seat was there for the taking, if they had a halfway decent candidate.
But if the GOP had one, Lamont would never have won the primary...or maybe even challenged Lieberman.
On the other hand, the Democratic voters in Connecticut could have supported a good man who had been loyal to them and his party for years, until they sold him out. They threw away a guaranteed win because the far left in that state had a hissy fit.

dead on - that is what the republicans of CT have always seen in Joe. What happened in CT shows how out of touch the "democratic" party is- not just the leadership but its followers also .

A group of lemmings heading over the cliff.

Republicans did not bother to look to their candidate. They knew what they had in Joe - one of the last intellectually honest politicians left.

All that you know about Ned Lamont was learned when he resigned from the all white Round Tree Country Club after 15 years of membership- timing very suspect - the beginning of his campaign.
 
All it demonstrates is that primaries are dominated by the radical wings, Democrat and Republican, common knowledge as indicated by the way politicians turn abruptly toward the center after winning one.
 
cranberry said:
All it demonstrates is that primaries are dominated by the radical wings, Democrat and Republican, common knowledge as indicated by the way politicians turn abruptly toward the center after winning one.

A must in CT to balance serving those of Fairfield County and then the rest of state.
 
Intellectually honest?
Bwahahahahahahah!
And what members of the Democratic "leadership" backed Lamont in the primary? Clintons? No. Schumer? No. Obama? No.
 
Fenian_Bastard said:
Intellectually honest?
Bwahahahahahahah!
And what members of the Democratic "leadership" backed Lamont in the primary? Clintons? No. Schumer? No. Obama? No.

Fenian - You must be wiped out. You have become the little dutch boy who finds the leak in the dike. You are starting to run out of fingers with all the leaks that need plugging this week.
 
Yes, Boom. I'm looking around at the building conservative wave and the resounding endorsement of our wildly successful and popular president.
Just stop posting dumb things, over and over again, and life will return to normal.
 
Fenian_Bastard said:
Yes, Boom. I'm looking around at the building conservative wave and the resounding endorsement of our wildly successful and popular president.
Just stop posting dumb things, over and over again, and life will return to normal.

The dumb things posted are the spoken word of your boy long john.

Stay alert - With 4 sections now to this board we can be a moving target. You will never be able to find a plug all leaks.
 
Jesus Boom, a suicide joke?

Alright, I'll play.

If he had enough to drink, Mrs. Foster.
 
See Ya ned .........

Was happy to pull the lever for Joe Lieberman of the "Connecticut for Lieberman" party..

Going into vote there were annoying Lamont supporters encouraging a "vote for ned" .

I overheard one gentlmen tell Lamont supporer that he would if he was struck by lightening on his 100 foot walk to the voting booth.
 
Boom_70 said:
See Ya ned .........

Was happy to pull the lever for Joe Lieberman of the "Connecticut for Lieberman" party..

Going into vote there were annoying Lamont supporters encouraging a "vote for ned" .

I overheard one gentlmen tell Lamont supporer that he would if he was struck by lightening on his 100 foot walk to the voting booth.

You always vote drunk?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top