There is no love for CarrSports among the UAB faithful and there never will be. We didn't hire those jerkoffs, UAB did (or possibly UAT pushed them onto President Ray Watts. I rule out no kind of dirty dealing in the run-up to that shut down.)
That said, they did exactly what they were hired to do - they delivered a report to the university administration that painted the athletic department in the poorest possible light, choosing the lowest revenue projections and the highest expenses that they could justify. For instance, they went to the head coach in each sport and asked "In a perfect world, if you could get every improvement for your program you asked for, what would you want?", and then they used that Christmas list (and the corresponding expense) as the budget that sport required to succeed. Carr also used the football ticket sales for 2012 and 13 (five wins total and the absolute lowest ebb of UAB football) to project future ticket revenues and left out 2014 (Bill Clark's first year, six wins and increasing attendance as the season went on).
The Hartford boosters should have paid those whores more and made it clear how they wanted the report to read, or perhaps that service is only available to the institution itself.
edit: When UAB football opens the new stadium against Liberty, I intend to get an 8x10 glossy of the sold out stands, write "**** you guys" on it with a sharpie, and mail it to CarrSports.
Probably the biggest voice who came out and disputed the Carr Report was Andy Schwartz, a sports economics guy who we didn't pay. He just read over the Carr Report, saw that it was a steaming heap of BS, and wrote articles saying so and pointing out specific instances where they were cooking the books. Kristi Dosh, who at the time was covering sports economics for ESPN, also piped up in defense of UAB football and called out CarrSports for writing a highly biased spin report that pushed for the shut down.