Tonight's Dem Debate - Ohio

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Re: Tonight's Dem Debate

This is getting interesting. The facilitators want to move the debate past health care and discuss more topics but the candidates want to keep on discussing it. I'm with the candidates on this one. This is one of the few areas where they differ and it's a huge issue.

I'd say the debate's a draw thus far.
 
Re: Tonight's Dem Debate

joe_schmoe said:
3. No. If I'm asking the questions, I ask why they both feel the need to try to turn our country toward a more socialist society.

It's the natural progression of a government. If you've noticed, even the republicans have done more than their share to edge us in that direction. The big lie most people tell themselves is that a republican in politics today is very different from a democrat. Republicans just use different tactics and have different priorities when they steal, allocate, and redistribute. And they lean a little fascist.

I think you'd probably learn more to ask them, with sincerity, why the sky is blue. You'd learn as much or more.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Re: Tonight's Dem Debate

writing irish said:
May have to give slight edge to HRC, IMO.

Agree. BO seemed a little tired, almost annoyed. Hillary did very well. Maybe too late, but still a good showing.
 
Re: Tonight's Dem Debate

Guy_Incognito said:
writing irish said:
May have to give slight edge to HRC, IMO.

She needs more than that.

Yes she does. She looked good overall. She didn't look good by harping on the "plagiarism" red herring, though. She scored style points with the rhetorical invocation of veterans at the end.

Obama didn't look bad, but didn't have an extra-base hit all night...just slapped opposite-field singles in unspectacular fashion.
 
Re: Tonight's Dem Debate

21 said:
writing irish said:
May have to give slight edge to HRC, IMO.

Agree. BO seemed a little tired, almost annoyed. Hillary did very well. Maybe too late, but still a good showing.
I'd be annoyed if a Clinton accused me of cheating, too, and had to sit there and defend myself against the biggest fake and liar we've ever seen.
 
Re: Tonight's Dem Debate

markvid said:
21 said:
writing irish said:
May have to give slight edge to HRC, IMO.

Agree. BO seemed a little tired, almost annoyed. Hillary did very well. Maybe too late, but still a good showing.
I'd be annoyed if a Clinton accused me of cheating, too, and had to sit there and defend myself against the biggest fake and liar we've ever seen.

That's one of the reasons you're not in politics. It goes with the territory.
 
Re: Tonight's Dem Debate

The Clinton Brothers take it to a new level.
 
Re: Tonight's Dem Debate

AP first write-through

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080222/ap_on_el_pr/democrats_debate
 
Re: Tonight's Dem Debate

writing irish said:
Obama didn't look bad, but didn't have an extra-base hit all night...just slapped opposite-field singles in unspectacular fashion.

Which may have been the smart way for Obama to go at this point. Don't go into a shell, but don't swing for the fences and pop-up on the infield either.
 
Re: Tonight's Dem Debate

suburbia said:
writing irish said:
Obama didn't look bad, but didn't have an extra-base hit all night...just slapped opposite-field singles in unspectacular fashion.

Which may have been the smart way for Obama to go at this point. Don't go into a shell, but don't swing for the fences and pop-up on the infield either.

Good point. Agree with 21 that he seemed tired, though. A notch below his usual level of energy.
 
Re: Tonight's Dem Debate

buckweaver said:
markvid said:
The Clinton Brothers take it to a new level.

markvid said:
I'd be annoyed if a Clinton accused me of cheating, too, and had to sit there and defend myself against the biggest fake and liar we've ever seen.

Chrissakes. We get it already. You hate anything with the letters N-O-T-N-I-L-C. ::)

re: bolded phrase ... please tell me you weren't alive during Nixon's term. Let's be a little more realistic here.
I was only 6 when he quit.
 
Re: Tonight's Dem Debate

buckweaver said:
re: bolded phrase ... please tell me you weren't alive during Nixon's term. Let's be a little more realistic here.

Would you call him the biggest fake you've ever seen? I wouldn't. And not just because I'm too young to have seen him.
 
Re: Tonight's Dem Debate

buckweaver said:
Guy_Incognito said:
buckweaver said:
re: bolded phrase ... please tell me you weren't alive during Nixon's term. Let's be a little more realistic here.

Would you call him the biggest fake you've ever seen? I wouldn't. And not just because I'm too young to have seen him.

No, he wasn't fake. You got me there.

Is it hypertechnical to point out that half of the description that you attributed to him as the worst of our generation didn't apply to him at all?
 
Re: Tonight's Dem Debate

21 said:
writing irish said:
May have to give slight edge to HRC, IMO.

Agree. BO seemed a little tired, almost annoyed. Hillary did very well. Maybe too late, but still a good showing.

It was her dark suit that gave her a more serious look although when she stood up suit had a bit of Captain Kangaroo quality.
 
Re: Tonight's Dem Debate

buckweaver said:
Guy_Incognito said:
buckweaver said:
Guy_Incognito said:
buckweaver said:
re: bolded phrase ... please tell me you weren't alive during Nixon's term. Let's be a little more realistic here.

Would you call him the biggest fake you've ever seen? I wouldn't. And not just because I'm too young to have seen him.

No, he wasn't fake. You got me there.

Is it hypertechnical to point out that half of the description that you attributed to him as the worst of our generation didn't apply to him at all?

I think it's beside the point, yes. To say that either of the Clintons have worse personal or professional ethics (for lack of a better catch-all term ...) than Nixon when comparing politicians of the last generation is fallacious, at best. It's an absurd claim, and speaks only to Markvid's ill regard of the former (but hopefully not his unfamiliarity with the latter).
Ok, claims to be a lifelong Yankees fan, and a lifelong Cubs fan, and now a Giants fan.
Nah, she's not a fake.
 
Re: Tonight's Dem Debate

buckweaver said:
markvid said:
Ok, claims to be a lifelong Yankees fan, and a lifelong Cubs fan, and now a Giants fan.
Nah, she's not a fake.

I didn't say she wasn't a lair and a fake. All politicians are.

I said you're taking the hatred to kind of disturbing levels.

Hatred? Disturbing?
I don't want her dead, just not leading this country.
Or a PTA, for that matter.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top