Sorry if this has already been mentioned, but I'm reading the Letters in this week's SI (Cole Hamels on cover) and I find one that references a great pre-Super Bowl story on the Cardinals' history and their supposed curse from pilfering an NFL title from the Pottsville Maroons. Really enjoyed the story, and remember being impressed that the writer tracked down a living member of the team.
They quoted him as a 94-year-old, and I didn't even do the math. Letter points out in this week's issue that he would have been 10 years old in 1925. Editor's Note explains that he watched the game as a 10-year-old and never played for the team. "SI regrets the error."
Again, I read right past it myself, impressed, but isn't this what the fact-checkers are there for? I'd always heard SI's fact-checkers were super-diligent, but I suppose they could be part of the cutbacks as well ...
They quoted him as a 94-year-old, and I didn't even do the math. Letter points out in this week's issue that he would have been 10 years old in 1925. Editor's Note explains that he watched the game as a 10-year-old and never played for the team. "SI regrets the error."
Again, I read right past it myself, impressed, but isn't this what the fact-checkers are there for? I'd always heard SI's fact-checkers were super-diligent, but I suppose they could be part of the cutbacks as well ...