THE RAAIDAHS! The real ones.

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Michael_ Gee

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Messages
39,411
This could be a cosmic DB, but the NFL network is showing its Super Bowl champion feature on the 1976 Raiders, and holy cow is it great. Basically, Phil Villapiano just confessed to war crimes. It's half over now, 9:30 EST, and I urge all football fans to check out the remainder.
 
pallister said:
Watching it now, and Villipiano is great.

Villipiano still looks like a badass and talks a good game, though I think he needs to be reminded that other than 1976, the Steelers got the better end of that particular rivalry. :)
 
Used cast-like weapons disguised as tape on his arms and hands. Designed by team trainer.
 
That was one hell of a rivalry, those Steelers and Raiders. I lived outside of Pittsburgh from '78 on, and I remember how crazy people got for those games. Terrible Towels everywhere.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
I defy anyone who watched that to tell me the game is more interesting today.
 
It's not so much the game but those who played it that were vastly more interesting. There are very few characters left in the NFL, just arrogant assholes and corporate shills.
 
Villapiano also was great on HBO's "Rebels of Oakland" about the 1970s Raiders and A's. (I'm biased because I grew up out there on those teams, but check it out if you get a chance, it works its way into HBO's rotation every few months.) Villapiano talks about how he'd tell his wife he dreaded training camp, but how it was really a nonstop party for the Raiders.
 
pallister said:
It's not so much the game but those who played it that were vastly more interesting.

Professional fooball in America is a special game. Played nowhere else in the world, it is a unique game. The Men Who Play It, make it so.

Ahem.

It must also be noted that the only time those Raiders beat Pittsburgh was when Hariis and Blier were out for that 1976 AFC title game. Otherwise, Oakland lost AFC title games at a bad clip that decade. Starting in 1968, I think they lost in 68, 69, 73, 74, 75 and 77. But what a cast of characters; I can't get enough of their stories.
 
What number is the (cue Alec Baldwin voice-over) "America's Game" countdown on now?

Personally I think the 1983 LA Raiders should be a lot higher than No. 20. Can anyone else back me up?

The manpower:Marcus Allen (Hall of Fame running back), All-Pro caliber players at other offensive positions (Cliff Branch at WR, Todd Christensen TE), a two-time Super Bowl winning QB (Jim Plunkett), Howie Long and Ted Hendricks on the D-Line, together with two of THE BEST corners of their era (Lester Hayes and Mike Haynes).

The record: 12-4 regular season, two blowout wins the playoffs, a Super Bowl 38-9 demolition of Redskins team - the defending SB champs - that had set a record for most points in the regular season.

The countdown competition: No. 19 is, ghhehh (Keith Olbermann voice), the 1999 St. Louis Rams. PUH-LEASE. Their marquee players were limited to the offense only, their Super Bowl competition was decidedly ordinary, they played in a weak NFC West, and I see two HOF'ers tops (Marshall Faulk and Tory Holt) on that roster.
 
Piotr Rasputin said:
pallister said:
It's not so much the game but those who played it that were vastly more interesting.

Professional fooball in America is a special game. Played nowhere else in the world, it is a unique game. The Men Who Play It, make it so.

Ahem.

It must also be noted that the only time those Raiders beat Pittsburgh was when Hariis and Blier were out for that 1976 AFC title game. Otherwise, Oakland lost AFC title games at a bad clip that decade. Starting in 1968, I think they lost in 68, 69, 73, 74, 75 and 77. But what a cast of characters; I can't get enough of their stories.

And don't forget the conference semifinals (whatever they called it then) in 1972. Please remind Madden about that one. He's STILL pissed about the Immaculate Reception.
 
outofplace said:
Piotr Rasputin said:
pallister said:
It's not so much the game but those who played it that were vastly more interesting.

Professional fooball in America is a special game. Played nowhere else in the world, it is a unique game. The Men Who Play It, make it so.

Ahem.

It must also be noted that the only time those Raiders beat Pittsburgh was when Hariis and Blier were out for that 1976 AFC title game. Otherwise, Oakland lost AFC title games at a bad clip that decade. Starting in 1968, I think they lost in 68, 69, 73, 74, 75 and 77. But what a cast of characters; I can't get enough of their stories.

And don't forget the conference semifinals (whatever they called it then) in 1972. Please remind Madden about that one. He's STILL pissed about the Immaculate Reception.

Tatum never touched the ball!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Piotr Rasputin said:
outofplace said:
Piotr Rasputin said:
pallister said:
It's not so much the game but those who played it that were vastly more interesting.

Professional fooball in America is a special game. Played nowhere else in the world, it is a unique game. The Men Who Play It, make it so.

Ahem.

It must also be noted that the only time those Raiders beat Pittsburgh was when Hariis and Blier were out for that 1976 AFC title game. Otherwise, Oakland lost AFC title games at a bad clip that decade. Starting in 1968, I think they lost in 68, 69, 73, 74, 75 and 77. But what a cast of characters; I can't get enough of their stories.

And don't forget the conference semifinals (whatever they called it then) in 1972. Please remind Madden about that one. He's STILL pissed about the Immaculate Reception.

Tatum never touched the ball!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Between that and the tuck rule, it's amazing any Raiders fan ever sleeps. And the funny part is both teams were a long way from the Super Bowl.
In '72, the Raiders would have had to go through the undefeated Dolphins just to get there. And in 2001, they would have just gotten their butts kicked in Pittsburgh anyway. It's Raiders' tradition!
 
outofplace said:
Piotr Rasputin said:
outofplace said:
Piotr Rasputin said:
pallister said:
It's not so much the game but those who played it that were vastly more interesting.

Professional fooball in America is a special game. Played nowhere else in the world, it is a unique game. The Men Who Play It, make it so.

Ahem.

It must also be noted that the only time those Raiders beat Pittsburgh was when Hariis and Blier were out for that 1976 AFC title game. Otherwise, Oakland lost AFC title games at a bad clip that decade. Starting in 1968, I think they lost in 68, 69, 73, 74, 75 and 77. But what a cast of characters; I can't get enough of their stories.

And don't forget the conference semifinals (whatever they called it then) in 1972. Please remind Madden about that one. He's STILL pissed about the Immaculate Reception.

Tatum never touched the ball!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Between that and the tuck rule, it's amazing any Raiders fan ever sleeps. And the funny part is both teams were a long way from the Super Bowl.
In '72, the Raiders would have had to go through the undefeated Dolphins just to get there. And in 2001, they would have just gotten their butts kicked in Pittsburgh anyway. It's Raiders' tradition!

'72 I can agree with. But those 2001 Raiders were quite good. And those Steelers . . . let's just say they had gotten in the habit of losing AFC title games at home.
 
Piotr Rasputin said:
outofplace said:
Piotr Rasputin said:
outofplace said:
Piotr Rasputin said:
pallister said:
It's not so much the game but those who played it that were vastly more interesting.

Professional fooball in America is a special game. Played nowhere else in the world, it is a unique game. The Men Who Play It, make it so.

Ahem.

It must also be noted that the only time those Raiders beat Pittsburgh was when Hariis and Blier were out for that 1976 AFC title game. Otherwise, Oakland lost AFC title games at a bad clip that decade. Starting in 1968, I think they lost in 68, 69, 73, 74, 75 and 77. But what a cast of characters; I can't get enough of their stories.

And don't forget the conference semifinals (whatever they called it then) in 1972. Please remind Madden about that one. He's STILL pissed about the Immaculate Reception.

Tatum never touched the ball!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Between that and the tuck rule, it's amazing any Raiders fan ever sleeps. And the funny part is both teams were a long way from the Super Bowl.
In '72, the Raiders would have had to go through the undefeated Dolphins just to get there. And in 2001, they would have just gotten their butts kicked in Pittsburgh anyway. It's Raiders' tradition!

'72 I can agree with. But those 2001 Raiders were quite good. And those Steelers . . . let's just say they had gotten in the habit of losing AFC title games at home.

Oh, I know all about those 2001 Raiders. Why do you think I was rooting for them against the Patriots? :)

And as for all those lost AFC title games, at least they were getting there.
 
the fop said:
Villapiano also was great on HBO's "Rebels of Oakland" about the 1970s Raiders and A's. (I'm biased because I grew up out there on those teams, but check it out if you get a chance, it works its way into HBO's rotation every few months.) Villapiano talks about how he'd tell his wife he dreaded training camp, but how it was really a nonstop party for the Raiders.

Anybody sees this is coming on soon, an alert would be nice.

If nothing else, the Raidahs of yesteryear were colorful. The fact that they came along during the Steelers dynasty years left them as more of a historical footnote.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top