The c-word

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

heyabbott said:
I thought this was another Hillary thread.

That made me laugh.


That being said, that may be the corniest thing I've ever read. Do the Ivory Towerites REALLY think those things work?
 
It'd be funny if the "can't" part was actually a typo autofixed by Word.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
I'll bet one of Mr.Zell's more internet savvy underlings opened up a Word document, put in http://sam.trb at the top with a "Sam's thoughts" heading and told him to post away.
 
Why do women have no sense of humor about that word? And I'm not talking about can't.

You can call them 17 different kinds of ***** and ho, and they won't blink. Whisper that word, and they go Lorena Bobbit on you.

Why?
 
I was informed about this today. I, for one, was fooled. I couldn't believe it. Wait ... is "couldn't" allowed?
 
I like the comment from someone who said "I cvnt stand that word either."

And yes, it's an offensive word, just like any other variation on ***** or ho. Why would you ever think those would be acceptable to call someone?
 
Ice_Cube_01.jpg


finds it perfectly acceptable
 
Diabeetus said:
I like the comment from someone who said "I cvnt stand that word either."

And yes, it's an offensive word, just like any other variation on ***** or ho. Why would you ever think those would be acceptable to call someone?
Not "just like" ***** and ho.

How can I make the point....?

---------

Interviewer.....Chevy Chase
Mr. Wilson.....Richard Pryor

Interviewer: Alright, Mr. Wilson, you've done just fine on the Rorshact.. your papers are in good order.. your file's fine.. no difficulties with your motor skills.. And I think you're probably ready for this job. We've got one more psychological test we always do here. It's just a Word Association. I'll throw you out a few words - anything that comes to your mind, just throw back at me, okay? It's kind of an arbitrary thing. Like, if I say "dog", you'd say..?

Mr. Wilson: "Tree".

Interviewer: "Tree". [ nods head, prepares the test papers ] "Dog".

Mr. Wilson: "Tree".

Interviewer: "Fast".

Mr. Wilson: "Slow".

Interviewer: "Rain".

Mr. Wilson: "Snow".

Interviewer: "White".

Mr. Wilson: "Black".

Interviewer: "Bean".

Mr. Wilson: "Pod".

Interviewer: [ casually ] "Negro".

Mr. Wilson: "Whitey".

Interviewer: "Tarbaby".

Mr. Wilson: [ silent, sure he didn't hear what he thinks he heard ] What'd you say?

Interviewer: [ repeating ] "Tarbaby".

Mr. Wilson: "Ofay".

Interviewer: "Colored".

Mr. Wilson: "Redneck".

Interviewer: "Junglebunny".

Mr. Wilson: [ starting to get angry ] "Peckerwood!"

Interviewer: "Burrhead".

Mr. Wilson: [ defensive ] "Cracker!"

Interviewer: [ aggressive ] "Spearchucker".

Mr. Wilson: "White trash!"

Interviewer: "Jungle Bunny!"

Mr. Wilson: [ upset ] "Honky!"

Interviewer: "Spade!

Mr. Wilson: [ really upset ] "Honky Honky!"

Interviewer: [ relentless ] "******!"

Mr. Wilson: [ immediate ] "Dead honky!" [ face starts to flinch ]
 
I've certainly encountered Zell's attitude -- we're outlawing the word "can't" -- on newspapers, and what it says to me is that they don't want the staff to speak honestly. When it comes from an editor, it means that although the words may superficially be directed at the newsroom, really the editor is trying to impress the publisher. When it comes from the Sam Zells of the world -- well, even if the sentiment is sincere, he ought to know that we've been trained from the get-go to dismiss catch phrases, buzzwords and platitudes no matter the source.

I can't speak for other departments, but it's no way to reach a newsroom. No matter the audience, he'd probably gain more respect by rephrasing it as a defeatist attitude isn't going to be especially helpful, we need you to help us identify how we can restore first your belief in our products and then our customers'. He would achieve his desired effect rather than coming off like a scolding parent telling a 5-year-old, "Don't ever let me hear you say the c-word again!"
 
There are good ways to get a point across and bad ways.

Zell's approach is a bad one. Then-Dallas Cowboys coach Jimmy Johnson has a good one. Instead of saying "Don't fumble," he'd say "protect the football." Positive image instead of a negative one.

He's also the guy who'd cut a third string tight end for falling asleep in a meeting, but would turn around and "punish" Troy Aikman for falling asleep by whispering "Troy! Troy! Wake up!"
 
forever_town said:
There are good ways to get a point across and bad ways.

Zell's approach is a bad one. Then-Dallas Cowboys coach Jimmy Johnson has a good one. Instead of saying "Don't fumble," he'd say "protect the football." Positive image instead of a negative one.

He's also the guy who'd cut a third string tight end for falling asleep in a meeting, but would turn around and "punish" Troy Aikman for falling asleep by whispering "Troy! Troy! Wake up!"
You just now discovering that there's preferential treatment in this world?
 
hondo said:
You just now discovering that there's preferential treatment in this world?
You think I'm condemning Johnson for that? Hell no.

You earn privileges. In his way of thinking, Aikman had. The third string tight end had not.
 
hondo said:
Why do blacks women have no sense of humor about that word? And I'm not talking about n----- can't.

You can call them 17 different kinds of junglebunny and spearchucker ***** and ho, and they won't blink. Whisper that word, and they go Malcolm X Lorena Bobbit on you.

Why?

Why do I get the feeling Hondo has had this kind of conversation before?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top