Ace
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2002
- Messages
- 21,826
So W is expected to announce a "surge" in troops in Iraq this week.
My question is that since this is obviously a word the White House is floating to make an increase in troops sound as good as possible, why are media outlets using this word at all?
Why not say that Bush is expected to increase the troop level in Iraq by 20,000.
I know why the White House wants to use the word. It sounds strong, it sounds temporary. But why does the media buy into this crap so often?
My question is that since this is obviously a word the White House is floating to make an increase in troops sound as good as possible, why are media outlets using this word at all?
Why not say that Bush is expected to increase the troop level in Iraq by 20,000.
I know why the White House wants to use the word. It sounds strong, it sounds temporary. But why does the media buy into this crap so often?