Stu Scott has cancer

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Joined
Aug 18, 2005
Messages
14,163
Per his Twitter feed ...

ESPN anchor Stuart Scott tweeted Monday that he has been diagnosed again with cancer: "Blessed by prayers..I'm back in the Fight. C reared its head again. Chemo evry 2 wks but I'll still work, still work out..still


Not a fan of his TV schtick, but I hope things go well for him.
 
I hope he beats it, but what's really bothering me is that avatar, Evil. WTF is that?
 
I like to think it's Care Bear seconds after Sonner has pushed her over the edge. :D

Seriously, I have no idea. I found it in the Balog of the Internet.. And like that Kramer painting it fascinates me.
 
Stu has fought through so much already with Cancer, and it's pretty clear he is a tough dude . . . fighting through how much criticism he gets to continue to do his job his way. I'm not a fan of his delivery, but he has my respect and prayers. Go get 'em Stu.
 
Yeah, I've been tough on Stu and his schtick but we get humbling news like this all the time.
Too often we are haters.
Good luck, Stu ... beat this.
 
Stu is a good guy and understands a lot of people have little use for his style.

Watching him on SC right now and he is absolutely dialed in. Perhaps this is therapeutic for him. I say that, as a TV guy many levels below Stu, that we often use our jobs to block out the horrible elements in our lives.

Nothing makes us all feel better than kicking serious ass on a show. :)

Go get C and take it down, Stu.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Never hated on Stu. No reason to. Seems like a great guy that enjoys what he does. Hope he kicks cancer's butt, again.
 
When he missed Monday Night Football for a couple weeks in December, this is just what I feared.
Get out the whuppin' stick, young fella.
 
Isn't this his third diagnosis? That's usually a really bad sign.

Not a fan of his work, but I really hope he beats this.
 
I have been critical of his style as well, but he seems like a genuinely good guy. I hope this recurrence isn't as bad a sign as it seems and that he can beat its ass again.
 
Speaking of being critical of his style ...

Put aside whatever you might think of ESPN's Stuart Scott as a sports TV announcer and listen to this person.

"I'm not going to lie, it's scary. It's a very scary thing," Scott told USA TODAY Sports on Tuesday about a recurrence of cancer. "The immediate thought is I'm going to die."


What's with that lede? Opinionated and negative, especially in a sensitive story that is aiming for inspiration.

Good story otherwise, with excellent quotes. But if Stuart Scott saw it, and I'm guessing he did, that intro was hurtful. And unnecessary, under the circumstances. Definitely a lede that should have been rewritten.

I guess this was a column, but still not the time nor place for veiled ridicule.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/2013/01/15/stuart-scott-cancer-espn/1837559/
 
Riptide said:
Speaking of being critical of his style ...

Put aside whatever you might think of ESPN's Stuart Scott as a sports TV announcer and listen to this person.

"I'm not going to lie, it's scary. It's a very scary thing," Scott told USA TODAY Sports on Tuesday about a recurrence of cancer. "The immediate thought is I'm going to die."


What's with that lede? Opinionated and negative, especially in a sensitive story that is aiming for inspiration.

Good story otherwise, with excellent quotes. But if Stuart Scott saw it, and I'm guessing he did, that intro was hurtful. And unnecessary, under the circumstances. Definitely a lede that should have been rewritten.

I guess this was a column, but still not the time nor place for veiled ridicule.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/2013/01/15/stuart-scott-cancer-espn/1837559/

I don't disagree at all... but look through this thread. For some reason, everyone feels obligated to preface their comments with "I don't like his schtick, but..." Yeah, ****ty to put it in print, but that's because it's kind of a ****ty sentiment anywhere.

I feel terrible for him. This is a guy with kids who knows he is very much looking at the possibility of never seeing them grow up. Seems like a reasonable time to wish him well without critiquing his work.
 
That is the hard truth about Stu Scott: When he doesn't have cancer, he's loathed as a sports anchor.

Tell you what I like about Stu as an on-premises sports guy: He's very good delivering pertinent stats in real time.

From one C conquerer to another, Stu: Keep Conquering.
 
I think the point is that "loathing" a sports anchor seems trivial when we're talking about life and death.

It's not like he's a politician.
 
Songbird said:
That is the hard truth about Stu Scott: When he doesn't have cancer, he's loathed as a sports anchor.

Tell you what I like about Stu as an on-premises sports guy: He's very good delivering pertinent stats in real time.

From one C conquerer to another, Stu: Keep Conquering.

Except that he's not loathed as a sports anchor. You don't reach his level - and stay there - if you are loathed.

He's loathed by print journalists. Seems kind of silly at the moment.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top