It was so bizarre to see some Canadian media calling him the country's greatest athlete yesterday. And then going the extra mile to say, yes, that includes Gretzky.
Steve Nash isn't even the best athlete in his sport. Sure, he's inspired a ton of kids to play and you can argue he's done more for the sport here than Gretzky did for hockey in the U.S. But he's not even in the top 20 best basketball players of all-time.
Hall of Fame? Definitely. Though I'm ridiculously biased.
No, no, no. Surely it was Rusty Staub!The Canadian media has a very short memory. Don't they remember that Iron Mike Sharpe was Canada's greatest athlete?
The Canadian media has a very short memory. Don't they remember that Iron Mike Sharpe was Canada's greatest athlete?
Steve Nash didn't come close to doing more for the NBA than Gretzky did for the NHL. Did Nash fuel a league's expansion?
Who had the more difficult task? Gretzky trying to sell hockey to Californians? Or Nash trying to figure out how to dominate the NBA from Victoria, B.C.?
Nash is solidly in the second tier of great NBA point guards - on par with, say, Isiah Thomas and Clyde Frazier, but a step below Magic, Stockton, Kidd and Oscar.
And, he's got at least a few years left as the greatest Canadian basketball player ever, before falling to second behind Andrew Wiggins.
Nash is solidly in the second tier of great NBA point guards - on par with, say, Isiah Thomas and Clyde Frazier, but a step below Magic, Stockton, Kidd and Oscar.
And, he's got at least a few years left as the greatest Canadian basketball player ever, before falling to second behind Andrew Wiggins.
OK, so Duncan has to be greater than Nash for dominating the NBA from the Virgin Islands.![]()
No, but I think the the comparison is what Nash did for basketball in Canada to what Gretzky did for hockey. The better player is obviously not up for debate.Steve Nash didn't come close to doing more for the NBA than Gretzky did for the NHL. Did Nash fuel a league's expansion?