The technical end of it worked for me. I didn't have any problems viewing it.
In terms of content, we'll have to give them a chance to really get it going to see what it'll be like. First impression was that there was a bunch of stuff in there that I already knew by 10-something this morning when I read it. I'm not sure there's much need for box scores. But when you're not worried about how much space you're working with, I guess it's no big deal.
If they use some imagination and do strong enterprise and advances, this could work pretty well. If they're too firmly rooted in the old-school Sporting News ideal of covering every team, every sport with notes and box scores, it'll be sort of ho-hum -- not bad on occasion, but probably not something I'll look at every day.
Also, they could probably do a lot more with the design. A lot of pages looked like gray masses of type, which I suppose is better than the multi-font, multi-hued, multi-directional chaos of a certain other sports magazine. But overall, I think it's cool they're trying something. I'm interested to keep with it for a while and see how it goes.