San Jose update

[Moderator1]

I'm hearing it is going from 242 to 200 full-time employees.
That's a big slash.
Can that be right? Did my source have the numbers straight?
If so, yipes.

 

[dragonfly]

San Jose to cut 40 newsroom jobs

Lean Dean strikes again!


SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP) - The San Jose Mercury News plans to cut its newsroom staff by about 17 percent next month as readers and advertising dollars migrate to the Internet, the paper's new executive editor said Tuesday.

The newspaper plans to eliminate about 40 of the editorial department's 240 full-time positions beginning July 2, Carole Leigh Hutton, the paper's executive editor and vice president, told staff members during an afternoon meeting.

Management has not yet decided who will be laid off, and the number of people to lose their jobs will likely be less than 40 because a few already planned on leaving before the cuts were announced, Hutton said. No buyouts are being offered.

The cuts, which had been anticipated, will be completed by July 16. Under the paper's agreement with the San Jose Newspaper Guild, management has to consider employees' qualifications, competency, ability to do available work, and seniority in determining who gets laid off, Hutton said.

"It's a business decision. It's a difficult thing to do," Hutton said in an interview with The Associated Press. "We value the work of these people. We're not laying off poor performers. We're laying off journalists that are a key part of our organization."

The new round of cutbacks will be the third for the Mercury News newsroom in less than two years. The paper, which has a paid weekday circulation of 230,870, cut 52 people from its newsroom staff through buyouts in November 2005 and laid off 15 people in December 2006, according to the Newspaper Guild.

Last month, the paper owned by MediaNews Group Inc. also lost Executive Editor Susan Goldberg, who left to become editor of The (Cleveland) Plain Dealer, Ohio's largest newspaper.

Sylvia Ulloa, the guild president and a designer in the Mercury News' features department, said the latest cuts will be "bigger than an economic loss" for San Jose and surrounding communities because fewer journalists would be covering local news.

"This is a loss that the community is going to feel," she said. "We're not going to have the newspaper we have today."

Meanwhile, the San Francisco Chronicle, which has a weekday circulation of 386,564, is also bracing for a round of deep newsroom job cuts. The newspaper, owned by Hearst Corp., said last month it plans to reduce its 400-person newsroom staff by about one-fourth unless jobs could be eliminated through buyouts and retirement incentives.

Two weeks later, Managing Editor Robert Rosenthal announced he was stepping down.

 

[Jesus_Muscatel]

Story's on the wire.

You're right.

****.

 

[LATimesman]

Mercury News sports has survived relatively intact through the first rounds of cuts. (And I emphasize, that's only relative.) But I understand now that sports could get cut deeply.

 

[DanOregon]

Considering Singleton already owns the CC Times and the the Alameda Group. I'm pretty sure the number of papers with regular beat writers in the Bay Area have gone from up to 6 per sport to about 2.


And I don't understand the need to blame the Internet - web pages need content too. And where the hell is the online advertising?

 

[VJ]

What's scary is that if the Bay Area is considered at the forefront of technology in this country, are multiple series of layoffs the next step everywhere else?

 

[LATimesman]

DanOregon is correct.

But those cuts have already been made.

 

[slappy4428]

Lean Dean strikes again!


SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP) - The San Jose Mercury News plans to cut its newsroom staff by about 17 percent next month as readers and advertising dollars migrate to the Internet, the paper's new executive editor said Tuesday.

The newspaper plans to eliminate about 40 of the editorial department's 240 full-time positions beginning July 2, Carole Leigh Hutton, the paper's executive editor and vice president, told staff members during an afternoon meeting.

Management has not yet decided who will be laid off, and the number of people to lose their jobs will likely be less than 40 because a few already planned on leaving before the cuts were announced, Hutton said. No buyouts are being offered.

The cuts, which had been anticipated, will be completed by July 16. Under the paper's agreement with the San Jose Newspaper Guild, management has to consider employees' qualifications, competency, ability to do available work, and seniority in determining who gets laid off, Hutton said.

"It's a business decision. It's a difficult thing to do," Hutton said in an interview with The Associated Press. "We value the work of these people. We're not laying off poor performers. We're laying off journalists that are a key part of our organization."

The new round of cutbacks will be the third for the Mercury News newsroom in less than two years. The paper, which has a paid weekday circulation of 230,870, cut 52 people from its newsroom staff through buyouts in November 2005 and laid off 15 people in December 2006, according to the Newspaper Guild.

Last month, the paper owned by MediaNews Group Inc. also lost Executive Editor Susan Goldberg, who left to become editor of The (Cleveland) Plain Dealer, Ohio's largest newspaper.

Sylvia Ulloa, the guild president and a designer in the Mercury News' features department, said the latest cuts will be "bigger than an economic loss" for San Jose and surrounding communities because fewer journalists would be covering local news.

"This is a loss that the community is going to feel," she said. "We're not going to have the newspaper we have today."

Meanwhile, the San Francisco Chronicle, which has a weekday circulation of 386,564, is also bracing for a round of deep newsroom job cuts. The newspaper, owned by Hearst Corp., said last month it plans to reduce its 400-person newsroom staff by about one-fourth unless jobs could be eliminated through buyouts and retirement incentives.

Two weeks later, Managing Editor Robert Rosenthal announced he was stepping down.

That's 107 jobs in a little over 18 months...

Dean is an amazing individual.. of course, I've felt that way since he shuttered my paper 13 years ago -- damn near to the day, come to think of it.

 

[steveu]

In a matter of months, San Fran has gone from having one of the best newspaper markets in the country (save for the SF Fishwrap, but that's just me) to one of the worst.

Thanks, Lean Dean!

 

[DanOregon]

And its not just newspapers. Without as many newspaper stories to rip off, radio and television news will suffer as well.

 

[chazp]

And its not just newspapers. Without as many newspaper stories to rip off, radio and television news will suffer as well.

You are so right. Sports talk radio shows in our state often being with a host saying, "Did you see the LOCAL FISHWRAPPER this morning? Well, they're reporting..."

 

[fishwrapper]

Fishwrapper?

 

[Billy Monday]

How do you cover a city with the size and complexity of San Jose with a newsroom of 200?
Do they want people to cancel their subscriptions and more advertisers to flee?
Because this just gives subscribers a far better reason to do that than the Internet and the economy.

Anybody know how it'll affect sports? I'll say a prayer for everybody over there.

 

[DanOregon]

Imagine going to a car dealer and looking at a car and checking under the hood (missing piston), the trunk (no spare tire) dash (no air conditioning) and interior (no cup holders). Sure you could drive it, but why should the dealer expect to sell a car that isn't as good or have as many features as earlier models when he is selling it for the same (or higher) price.

 

[lono]

My mother, of all people, unintentionally summed up the state of the newspaper business the other morning.

"The paper just keeps getting smaller and smaller," she said disgustedly. "There's nothing in it anymore."

And the paper she reads is in a top-10 media market, NOT the Podunk Times.

The suits keep giving people less and less and less and then scratch their heads, wondering why circulation is falling.

 

[Moderator1]

I'm told Monday is wait by phone day. They'll call between 8-10 a.m. Yeesh.

Also interesting to see who runs sports - SE is on maternity leave or going on maternity leave, one of the lower level editors quit.

More if I get it, keep your fingers crossed for folks you know out there.

 

[LATimesman]

The top assistants will remain intact in sports, so the plan to fill in while Rachel Wilner is on maternity leave probably won't change. The exit of one of the night-time assistants might have saved a copy editor from being fired. But sports will take a substantial hit this time around.

 

[SixToe]

Hutton - "We value the work of these people. We're not laying off poor performers. We're laying off journalists that are a key part of our organization."

What a tool.

When the **** is management going to realize you can't put out a newspaper, even if it is smaller, and write for the Internet and shoot video and conduct iPod interviews and blog and chat with readers with half the damn staff for a city that hasn't decreased in size?

"Joey, here are your new duties. We let go four of your coworkers in Sports so you'll have to pick up their work, too. Raise? Well, no, there aren't any raises. Advertising is declining in the newspaper industry, you know, and well, online advertising still is something we're working on. But don't forget you have an online chat tomorrow night at 7."

 

[statrat]

When are people like Singleton going to learn. "News and advertising migrating are migrating to the internet! To compete with that we must fire the reporters who allow us to have any hope of competing with internet!" Someone needs to wake up and realize that the biggest moneywaster in the business is the process of printing and distributing the paper. Go online and compete for the advertising dollars. It's time for newspaper companies to stop being luddites, can the press operations, and move on line.

 

[Bump_Wills]

When are people like Singleton going to learn. "News and advertising migrating are migrating to the internet! To compete with that we must fire the reporters who allow us to have any hope of competing with internet!" Someone needs to wake up and realize that the biggest moneywaster in the business is the process of printing and distributing the paper. Go online and compete for the advertising dollars. It's time for newspaper companies to stop being luddites, can the press operations, and move on line.

This is an incredibly naive view.

As maligned as print editions seem to be these days, they still the pay the bills to an extent that online, even with the loss of paper/printing costs, couldn't begin to cover.