Running Baseball Hot Stove Thread

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

I need to start doing Jedi mind tricks on various GMs. That's the only way the Brewers are going to get the value they think they can get out of Prince Fielder.
 
Steak Snabler said:
Carl Crawford signs with the Yankees before Thanksgiving or after?

I'm thinking Anaheim. I don't see how the Yankees can take care of their free agents AND make a serious run at Crawford and Lee. They'll get one or the other, but not both. My guess is that they'll focus on Lee, and Crawford will end up with the Angels.

Of course, my hope is that the Yankees sign Crawford, realize they have no more money, and Lee takes less money and goes to Cincinnati (hey, a dude can dream).
 
Cliff Lee to Milwaukee. You heard it hear first and won't hear it from anyone else.














* Because it'll never happen.
 
God, I figured I'd have to be the one to mention Punto. Well done, boys!

My goal, whenever I eventually relaunch my Punto blog, is to campaign to get him to an NL city. Nearest AL park to me is like a 9-hour drive. So I need him here.

Him in Cincinnati would make my ladyparts explode.
 
Bubbler said:
Cliff Lee to Milwaukee. You heard it hear first and won't hear it from anyone else.

There's a reason for that.













* Because it'll never happen.
 
Oh, I love the Hot Stove.

-As a Yankee fan, I'm hoping they don't sign Crawford or Lee - both will be bad contracts half way through the deal at best. The only thing that might make me change my mind is if Sabathia is stupid enough to opt out, and the Yankees are smart enough to not resign him.

- Who says no to a Burnett for Ollie Perez deal (no money changing hands)? Cashman should be on the phone to Alderson today. (Perez's contract is over after this year).
 
Guy_Incognito said:
Oh, I love the Hot Stove.

-As a Yankee fan, I'm hoping they don't sign Crawford or Lee - both will be bad contracts half way through the deal at best. The only thing that might make me change my mind is if Sabathia is stupid enough to opt out, and the Yankees are smart enough to not resign him.

- Who says no to a Burnett for Ollie Perez deal (no money changing hands)? Cashman should be on the phone to Alderson today. (Perez's contract is over after this year).

Do you really think they don't have the cash to sign Lee, then spend more on somebody else later? I'm not sure I would go after both, either, but they do need another arm. Those bad years at the end of the contract are part of the price to pay to win now.
 
outofplace said:
Guy_Incognito said:
Oh, I love the Hot Stove.

-As a Yankee fan, I'm hoping they don't sign Crawford or Lee - both will be bad contracts half way through the deal at best. The only thing that might make me change my mind is if Sabathia is stupid enough to opt out, and the Yankees are smart enough to not resign him.

- Who says no to a Burnett for Ollie Perez deal (no money changing hands)? Cashman should be on the phone to Alderson today. (Perez's contract is over after this year).

Do you really think they don't have the cash to sign Lee, then spend more on somebody else later? I'm not sure I would go after both, either, but they do need another arm. Those bad years at the end of the contract are part of the price to pay to win now.

Their payroll has limits (ask Johnny Damon). Bad contracts handcuff all teams, some less than others. Burnett is hurting them now, A-rod will soon, and if they don't play their cards right with Jeter, so will his (I'd offer him 2 years - 40 million or 3 years - 50 million & let him choose between them praying he chooses the former, but able to say you offered a 3 year deal).

Also, early in the dynasty they always - every year - integrated one rookie into the lineup, hitting him 9th, and kept the #5 SP spot for a rookie. They should certainly do that with a pitcher - they have enough good arms in AA & AAA to let them compete for a spot, and I would give Joba every chance to win the #4 spot. And Montero should be given the chance to become the part time DH / backup C job.
 
Guy_Incognito said:
outofplace said:
Guy_Incognito said:
Oh, I love the Hot Stove.

-As a Yankee fan, I'm hoping they don't sign Crawford or Lee - both will be bad contracts half way through the deal at best. The only thing that might make me change my mind is if Sabathia is stupid enough to opt out, and the Yankees are smart enough to not resign him.

- Who says no to a Burnett for Ollie Perez deal (no money changing hands)? Cashman should be on the phone to Alderson today. (Perez's contract is over after this year).

Do you really think they don't have the cash to sign Lee, then spend more on somebody else later? I'm not sure I would go after both, either, but they do need another arm. Those bad years at the end of the contract are part of the price to pay to win now.

Their payroll has limits (ask Johnny Damon). Bad contracts handcuff all teams, some less than others. Burnett is hurting them now, A-rod will soon, and if they don't play their cards right with Jeter, so will his (I'd offer him 2 years - 40 million or 3 years - 50 million & let him choose between them praying he chooses the former, but able to say you offered a 3 year deal).

Also, early in the dynasty they always - every year - integrated one rookie into the lineup, hitting him 9th, and kept the #5 SP spot for a rookie. They should certainly do that with a pitcher - they have enough good arms in AA & AAA to let them compete for a spot, and I would give Joba every chance to win the #4 spot. And Montero should be given the chance to become the part time DH / backup C job.

I know I've had this argument here before, but I still don't believe that losing Damon was about payroll limits. It was about playing hardball with Damon and Boras. They thought they could squeeze him and get him to take a one-year deal and they were wrong and it did hurt the team.

Giving Jeter big money, especially at the expense of adding Lee or Crawford, would be a huge mistake. He is not a $20-million-a-year player any more. The only justification for giving him that kind of money is if their payroll is more flexible than you believe. Otherwise, it's just dumb.

It's one thing to integrate young guys if they are ready. It is quite another to try to force it and then end up scrambling for pitching later.

I will be very surprised if the Yankees are not in the bidding for Lee.
 
If the Yankees don't offer Jeter 4 years/$80 mill Captain Fantastic will be insulted and the idiot fans who think he's the best shortstop in baseball will be screaming.

The final year of Posada's contract is an albatross. He simply can't catch anymore yet still believes he should be a fulltime catcher. Plus, he think Girardi is still getting even for the fact the he took Girardi's job all those years ago.

Montero by all accounts is not a major-league catcher and might never be, When I hear Stick Michael say the catcher of the future is Austin Romine, who played a AA Trenton this year, I believe him.

I still believe Lee is staying in Texas.
 
So let the fans scream. Any fan who thinks the Yankees are better off spending that money on Jeter than on either Lee or Crawford is an idiot.

This is assuming they really can't sign all three, which I'm not sure I am willing to buy. Actually, that does bring to mind one reason to sign Jeter if they can get him to take a shorter deal. They can use him to justify not spending on Lee or Crawford and save some money long term.

If they really are that close to the limit on their spending, it's time to ignore the fans and make a decision based on winning. Otherwise, what is the point of spending $200 million-plus?
 
outofplace said:
I know I've had this argument here before, but I still don't believe that losing Damon was about payroll limits. It was about playing hardball with Damon and Boras. They thought they could squeeze him and get him to take a one-year deal and they were wrong and it did hurt the team.

Giving Jeter big money, especially at the expense of adding Lee or Crawford, would be a huge mistake. He is not a $20-million-a-year player any more. The only justification for giving him that kind of money is if their payroll is more flexible than you believe. Otherwise, it's just dumb.

It's one thing to integrate young guys if they are ready. It is quite another to try to force it and then end up scrambling for pitching later.

I will be very surprised if the Yankees are not in the bidding for Lee.

They said they wouldn't go over 200M & they didn't, I'm taking them at their word - thought that leaves them room with some big salaries coming off (Vaszquez). With Jeter, they have to be careful not to publicly disrespect him - when your a Yankee fan, you have to realize that business decisions will sometimes impact on the field decisions - that's why they originally got Matsui, even though we had no idea (and I don't think they knew either) how good he would be. The key to the Jeter contract is to keep it short.

The reason not to sign Lee or Crawford is because you would have to commit to them at big money far longer than they will be worth it - that's why the Halladay contract was such a steal for the Phillies. The money I'm worried with them are not the years while you're still paying Jeter, but the years when you have to replace him.

I agree, but they never allow themselves to see if any of the kids are ready anymore. I think Montero and some of the pitchers are. There was no need for Vaszquez, Park, Mitre, Gaudin Winn etc. on this year's team. Melancon & Allbeledejo etc. would have been better bets from day 1.

I also think they WILL go after Lee, I just think it's a mistake. with one exceptional season, he's been not great in the regular season, and is about to be overpaid for a 31 year old starter. Again, if you can get him for 3 years, even at 75M, I'd do it but no longer. That's why the Yankees should be popping champagne if Sabathia opts out.
 
spnited said:
If the Yankees don't offer Jeter 4 years/$80 mill Captain Fantastic will be insulted and the idiot fans who think he's the best shortstop in baseball will be screaming.

The final year of Posada's contract is an albatross. He simply can't catch anymore yet still believes he should be a fulltime catcher. Plus, he think Girardi is still getting even for the fact the he took Girardi's job all those years ago.

Montero by all accounts is not a major-league catcher and might never be, When I hear Stick Michael say the catcher of the future is Austin Romine, who played a AA Trenton this year, I believe him.

I still believe Lee is staying in Texas.

With Posada, it's only 1 more year - they got lucky he's lasted this long. I agree that Romine is more likely to be the long term solution, but this year you have Posada, and by all accounts ROmine is not ready yet, whereas Montero's bat seems to be, so best case scenario, the following year Romine is starting with Montero playing 110-120 games at DH & 35-40 as backup C, and you don't have to waste a roster spot on the Molinas / Cervellis of the world.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top