TigerVols
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2003
- Messages
- 24,511
Thousands.Fantastic!
Although if the son paid by the word or inch, he was out a lot of money.
If someone pays for an obit and the item effectively becomes an advertisement, does that mitigate liability for false and defamatory claims?The battle over paid vs. free obits occupies much of my early small-town 5/6-day daily journalism career in the Eighties/early Nineties.
I started as SE at a 6-day daily where obits were free, and ran "substantially intact," that is, we ran whatever the funeral home gave us, but we did edit for grammar, spelling, blatant libel and other legal liability reasons.
Although not usually for length. Some of those free obits went on and on and on.
I remember it was a huge issue that we were very firm about using the factual statement "died" as opposed to " went to live in the light of the Lord," etc etc yadda yadda. That pissed some people off big time.
During my tenure there, it became an issue that funeral directors were charging as a non-optional part of the standard funeral package, a fairly significant sum (I think it was $400-500) for "publicity and publications."
Our publisher contended that given that reality, there was no reason newspapers should not charge for obits.
So we went to a flat rate of $50 for starters, which immediately raised the howls of the funeral homes.
If someone pays for an obit and the item effectively becomes an advertisement, does that mitigate liability for false and defamatory claims?
1. The no-holds-barred street brawl between rival TV news crews in “Anchorman” really could have been between copy editors and funeral home owners. Lots of hatred between those two groups.The battle over paid vs. free obits occupies much of my early small-town 5/6-day daily journalism career in the Eighties/early Nineties.
I started as SE at a 6-day daily where obits were free, and ran "substantially intact," that is, we ran whatever the funeral home gave us, but we did edit for grammar, spelling, blatant libel and other legal liability reasons.
Although not usually for length. Some of those free obits went on and on and on.
I remember it was a huge issue that we were very firm about using the factual statement "died" as opposed to " went to live in the light of the Lord," etc etc yadda yadda. That pissed some people off big time.
During my tenure there, it became an issue that funeral directors were charging as a non-optional part of the standard funeral package, a fairly significant sum (I think it was $400-500) for "publicity and publications."
Our publisher contended that given that reality, there was no reason newspapers should not charge for obits.
So we went to a flat rate of $50 for starters, which immediately raised the howls of the funeral homes.
He had grown up in the metro Detroit area, so we looked into putting the obit into the Free Press, but I think it was something like $500, so we just ran a death notice. (Pretty sure even that cost $75-100.)