Republican Debate

[21]

What's with the airplane, looks like the set of a new DieHard movie.

Hoping for a good pushing match, so one of those chairs goes hurtling backwards off the floating stage.

And apropos of nothing, Lou Dobbs has one helluva set of chompers.

 

[poindexter]

Let me know if they discuss in earnest, the $10-20 Trillion deficit. If not, its just a bunch of jacking off.

 

[poindexter]

This McCain seems very impressive

 

[westcoastvol]

McCain's come out swinging on Romney, douching his efforts as Mass governor. Romney's not taking it.

Huckabee and that other guy are probably feeling like Edwards did in the last, oh...all of the Democratic debates.

 

[DanOregon]

They look like they're sitting at desks made for fourth graders.

 

[Jack_Kerouac]

I'd really love McCain and Romney to just actually throw down. Mitt would be mighty embarrassed to get his ass kicked by a 71-year-old.

 

[GB-Hack]

They look like they're sitting at desks made for fourth graders.

Is that an apple on Romney's desk?

 

[Ben_Hecht]

I'd really love McCain and Romney to just actually throw down. Mitt would be mighty embarrassed to get his ass kicked by a 71-year-old.

Plastic Man has nothing to lose. C'mon, Ken, let 'er rip . . . if you can remember what this year's positions are, under the pressure . . .

 

[zeke12]

C'mon, Mittens, give 'im hell!

 

[writing irish]

Let's go Mitt-ster!

Let's go Mitt-ster!

 

[zeke12]

We Want Willard, clap-clap, clap-clap-clap!


We Want Willard, clap-clap, clap-clap-clap!

 

[Webster]

I'm a little confused, did McCain lead the largest squadron because of patriotism or profit?

 

[ondeadline]

I think I saw Jeff Foxworthy moderating.

 

[Boom_70]

McCain has twisted Mitt into a pretzel on the surge question. Whether you agree with him or not you have to give him credit for showing the balls to support the surge when it would have be easier to bail.

 

[ondeadline]

I liked when Ron Paul called out McCain and Romney for debating minor differences in their opinions on Iraq when there are, in fact, bigger issues and they pretty much are in agreement. Having said that, Paul shouldn't be there considering the polls.

 

[writing irish]

Oh, I like having no-chance candidates in debates. Seriously. They bring diversity of viewpoint, which is sorely lacking in mainstream politics, despite the vicious fighting amongst politicians whose views are a nanometer from one another's. Of course, Paul's a ****stick, but that's beside the point.

 

[Fenian_Bastard]

 

[Yawn]

Oh, I like having no-chance candidates in debates. Seriously. They bring diversity of viewpoint, which is sorely lacking in mainstream politics, despite the vicious fighting amongst politicians whose views are a nanometer from one another's. Of course, Paul's a ****stick, but that's beside the point.

And they never win, which is why they are able to say what they think. There's nothing to lose, no accountability factor.

 

[Fenian_Bastard]

Isn't "not winning" and saying the stuff anyway the ultimate act of responsibility?

 

[Guy_Incognito]

Isn't "not winning" and saying the stuff anyway the ultimate act of responsibility?

Not in this context.