Stoney said:
It truly is the ultimate cluster****. We can't afford to stay in, there doesn't seem to be any way to actually "win" ****ing thing, but walking away could have utterly catostrophic future consequences. So we just stay stuck in the middle. **** if I know what to do. **** if anyone does.
When I really think about things, I agree with Stoney, and have to concur with this. Heck,
everyone probably has to concur with this sentiment, and that is probably much of the problem with this situation.
Nobody knows what to do.
Then, I read through all six pages of this thread. And, I get up and pass my coffee table with the latest edition of Time magazine on it -- the one with the headline, "What Happens If We Leave Afghanistan" and a portrait of earless, noseless Aisha on the cover -- after she had run away from abusive in-laws, only to be dragged away so that she could be punished/maimed by, yes, her husband, who did it all with impunity. Indeed, his actions were sanctioned by the Taliban.
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2007238,00.html
I read through that story, and I just don't care. I agree with this:
Armchair_QB said:
If you're a glass half-full kind of guy, letting the Taliban retake Afghanistan could be a positive.
We could withdraw, let the Taliban retake Afghanistan, let it fill up with terrorists then start reducing our nuclear stockpile one missile at a time by bombing the country forward into the Stone Age.
What kind of freakin' people do what was done to Aisha? It's sheer, untenable, nonsensical barbarism that, ideally, could/should just be bombed away.
Then, my sense of reason, ethics and humanity asserts itself again, and the cycle begins all over again. And this war goes on, too...