Evil ... Thy name is Orville Redenbacher!!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2005
- Messages
- 14,163
Not sure how I feel about this one. At what age are parents no longer responsible for their kid's behavior?
At 17, I think a kid is older enough to be held accountable for his own choices . ... But 12? 14? 15?
Judge rules parental responsibility law unconstitutional
GARFIELD HEIGHTS, Ohio (AP) -- A judge has ruled that a law holding parents accountable for crimes their children commit is unconstitutional.
Garfield Heights Municipal Court Judge Jennifer Weiler dropped charges Friday against a Maple Heights mother accused under the law of failing to supervise her 17-year-old son, who police said instigated a high speed chase last summer. The chase ended when his car hit a tree.
Thelma Ephraim, 44, challenged the parental responsibility law ä believed to be the first in Ohio. Maple Heights adopted the ordinance last year to respond to complaints of teens congregating, violating curfew or vandalizing.
Weiler decided the law was vague and unevenly applied. She also said a provision allowing parents to defend themselves by convincing a court they tried to control their child unconstitutionally placed the burden on parents to prove their innocence.
Ephraim's lawyer, Ron C. Balbier, called the decision a "triumph for parents."
Maple Heights Mayor Michael Ciaravino said the city will appeal the decision.
"Children are profoundly influenced by their home environment," Ciaravino said. "But according to this decision, our children are left to the wolves."
The case involving Ephraim was the 11th time the city has brought charges against parents, Law Director Timothy Toma said.
Nine parents pleaded no contest and agreed to parenting classes, and a tenth case was dropped.
Bedford enforces a similar law, and Cleveland is considering enacting one.
At 17, I think a kid is older enough to be held accountable for his own choices . ... But 12? 14? 15?
Judge rules parental responsibility law unconstitutional
GARFIELD HEIGHTS, Ohio (AP) -- A judge has ruled that a law holding parents accountable for crimes their children commit is unconstitutional.
Garfield Heights Municipal Court Judge Jennifer Weiler dropped charges Friday against a Maple Heights mother accused under the law of failing to supervise her 17-year-old son, who police said instigated a high speed chase last summer. The chase ended when his car hit a tree.
Thelma Ephraim, 44, challenged the parental responsibility law ä believed to be the first in Ohio. Maple Heights adopted the ordinance last year to respond to complaints of teens congregating, violating curfew or vandalizing.
Weiler decided the law was vague and unevenly applied. She also said a provision allowing parents to defend themselves by convincing a court they tried to control their child unconstitutionally placed the burden on parents to prove their innocence.
Ephraim's lawyer, Ron C. Balbier, called the decision a "triumph for parents."
Maple Heights Mayor Michael Ciaravino said the city will appeal the decision.
"Children are profoundly influenced by their home environment," Ciaravino said. "But according to this decision, our children are left to the wolves."
The case involving Ephraim was the 11th time the city has brought charges against parents, Law Director Timothy Toma said.
Nine parents pleaded no contest and agreed to parenting classes, and a tenth case was dropped.
Bedford enforces a similar law, and Cleveland is considering enacting one.