Paging Lynn Hoppes ...

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Status
Not open for further replies.

Riptide

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
13,790
Deadspin says he writes just like those people on Wikipedia.

http://deadspin.com/5924851?utm_campaign=socialflow_deadspin_twitter&utm_source=deadspin_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow
 
Deadspin finds numerous Lynn Hoppes' passages identical to Wikipedia entries

Pretty thorough and pretty damning stuff from Isaac Rauch.

Not sure it's ethically quite as bad as plagiarizing another writer but looks bad.

http://deadspin.com/5924851
 
On the positive side, it frees up more time for Hoppes' video projects. :D
 
Wow is right.

The part about a word being randomly uppercase in both Hoppes' work and the Wikipedia page is pretty damning evidence that he did a strict cut-and-paste. That and some clumsy phrasing that just by coincidence appears in both places?

It's obvious that Deadspin has a hard-on for Hoppes. But given that, and after the Sarah Phillips fiasco that would have gotten plenty of people fired, he's got to be smart enough to toe the line. If he's not that smart (or probably more likely, is that cocky not to be bothered with it), then he definitely should be gone.
 
Frank_Ridgeway said:
He's got to be done.
Stick a fork in him but I 'll bet you he'll be hired by someone fairly quickly. What he did in very embarrassing. Not that he was caught but how many times he did it. Very sloppy.
 
To me, this is an example of how technology is failing this business.
 
Or buried so far away in Bristol that he never writes again.
Seriously though, he had to be on a zero tolerance policy after the whole Phillips thing
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
BurnsWhenIPee said:
Would it surprise anyone if ESPN shrugs it off without a word and he keeps his job?

No.

He's a smart guy and can find another way to make a living. They can't keep him. And they need to address it very quickly.
 
If Hoppes keeps his job, you really have to wonder what he has pictures of Walsh doing?

Who goes to Page 2 (or whatever it's called) just because of his work product, anyway? Surely he can be replaced by someone making 2/3rds or even less what he hauls down. From a business perspective alone, I'm surprised he's still there.
 
Inky_Wretch said:
BurnsWhenIPee said:
Would it surprise anyone if ESPN shrugs it off without a word and he keeps his job?

You mean like the whole Sarah Phillips fiasco?

Yep.

Frank_Ridgeway said:
They can't keep him. And they need to address it very quickly.

I think you're giving ESPN far too much credit in wanting to keep some "street cred" as a legitimate journalistic site.
 
How Lynn Hoppes writes a story:

Visits various web sites for "water cooler" topics.

Gets idea for story.

Googles Internet on the story subject.

Hits control "C" and control "V".

Finishes story, posts it on ESPN web site.

Sits back and admires the swag he has in his office.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top