OJ finds the real killer

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

TheSportsPredictor

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2004
Messages
32,934
He looked in a mirror:

O.J Simpson has confessed to Oprah Winfrey that he murdered his former wife, it has been reported.

The talk show host made headlines recently saying that one of her regrets was never having got the shamed former sportsman to confess to the killing.

And it appears her wish may well have come true with reports Simpson has already told one of her producers in an interview from jail that he knifed ex-wife Nicole in self-defence - a confession he will now repeat to the talk show queen during a spectacular televised sit down interview.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2006908/OJ-Simpson-confessed-Nicole-Brown-murder-Oprah-TV-interview-planned.html#ixzz1Q3oykfvW
 
Those details don't even make sense. Nor does the first sentence, since it says later he told it to a producer, not to Oprah.
 
Forget peace of mind for the Brown and/or Goldman families, the important thing is that Oprah gets her wish.
 
yeah, the 6-2, 225-pound OJ had to basically decapitate the 5-6, 120-pound Nicole in order to defend his very life.

LOL
 
This has me very troubled, and concerned.

Why didn't the gloves fit when he tried them on? I wish there was an explanation... one that 12 people with a modicum of common sense could reasonably digest.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Trouser_Buddah said:
This has me very troubled, and concerned.

Why didn't the gloves fit when he tried them on? I wish there was an explanation... one that 12 people with a modicum of common sense could reasonably digest.

Shrinkage.
 
Trouser_Buddah said:
This has me very troubled, and concerned.

Why didn't the gloves fit when he tried them on? I wish there was an explanation... one that 12 people with a modicum of common sense could reasonably digest.

It was a leather glove that had been soaked in blood, submitted to testing, and frozen and unfrozen several times. There's no way it was in its original shape.
 
JonnyD said:
Trouser_Buddah said:
This has me very troubled, and concerned.

Why didn't the gloves fit when he tried them on? I wish there was an explanation... one that 12 people with a modicum of common sense could reasonably digest.

It was a leather glove that had been soaked in blood, submitted to testing, and frozen and unfrozen several times. There's no way it was in its original shape.


Jonny, that whooshing sound was T_B's post flying over your head.
 
This scumbag turned his wife, and Ron Goldman, into a Pez dispenser and now, to get Oprah big ratings, is going to confess! What a total piece of ****. As much as I hated that friggin murderer before, I hate him exponentially more now after hearing this. Piece of ****.
 
That glove thing was a lawyer's nightmare; they took a huge chance and blew it. They never needed that and should have known that they should only put on evidence that they know they answer to.

I will say this forever, why Garcetti charged OJ in downtown was the stupidest decision he ever made, OJ lived in Brentwood and killed in Brentwood, he should have been tried there.
 
This might be true. But...the Daily Mail is notorious for making up stories. Making up. And not in a National Enquirer "Yeah-we-say-they-make-up-stories-but-they're-actually-really-accurate-just-ask-john-edwards" way. They're the ones who paid the mom to say she gave her little girl botox and bikini waxes even though, you know, the mom didn't give her kid botox and bikini waxes.
 
qtlaw said:
I will say this forever, why Garcetti charged OJ in downtown was the stupidest decision he ever made, OJ lived in Brentwood and killed in Brentwood, he should have been tried there.

From what I've read, there were a couple reasons. First, the Brentwood courthouse could have never accomodated the trial, logistically. Second of all, trying the case in all-white Brentwood probably would have triggered another riot, so soon after the Rodney King trial.

Someone posted that the glove was a mistake by the prosecution. I agree, but it was just one of a million mistakes. And, ultimately, it might not have matterd anyway. He was never, ever, ever, ever going to get convicted by a jury at that time period, with those demographics. Never. Never, ever, ever. There is fascinating stuff out there about Marcia Clark going down to Phoenix to practice for mock focus group juries of black women. Almost unanimously, they hated her and loved O.J. No matter how they tried to spin the evidence or tweak the way the facts were presented, black women were not going to convict him in that case, at that time, in that city. Never.
 
Oh, and I'm not buying this news yet, either, considering the sources reporting it at this point. After the Gabrielle Giffords clusterf$ck, the "Gore Defeats Bush" headlines, Les Miles' hiring at Michigan, and so forth and so on, I pretty much need it rock solid these days before I buy in.
 
Trouser_Buddah said:
This has me very troubled, and concerned.

Why didn't the gloves fit when he tried them on? I wish there was an explanation... one that 12 people with a modicum of common sense could reasonably digest.

Bring back the glove expert.
 
**** Whitman said:
Oh, and I'm not buying this news yet, either, considering the sources reporting it at this point. After the Gabrielle Giffords clusterf$ck, the "Gore Defeats Bush" headlines, Les Miles' hiring at Michigan, and so forth and so on, I pretty much need it rock solid these days before I buy in.

Was there ever a Gore defeats Bush headline?
 
I remember watching way more of the trial than I should have.

There was never a second where I didn't think he was guilty and there was never a second where I wasn't positive that he would be found not guilty. Almost all of the people I was watching with felt the exact same way.
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
**** Whitman said:
Oh, and I'm not buying this news yet, either, considering the sources reporting it at this point. After the Gabrielle Giffords clusterf$ck, the "Gore Defeats Bush" headlines, Les Miles' hiring at Michigan, and so forth and so on, I pretty much need it rock solid these days before I buy in.

Was there ever a Gore defeats Bush headline?

Didn't some of the TV news networks call it?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top