Of the 11 BCS unbeatens, which one has the best chance of running the table?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hockeybeat
  • Start date Start date
Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Pretty self-explanatory. Which team finishes the season with an unbeaten record?

  • No. 1 LSU (6-0)

    Votes: 6 19.4%
  • No. 2 Cal (5-0)

    Votes: 1 3.2%
  • No. 3 Ohio State (6-0)

    Votes: 9 29.0%
  • No. 4 Boston College (6-0)

    Votes: 1 3.2%
  • No. 5 South Florida (5-0)

    Votes: 3 9.7%
  • No. 11 Missouri (5-0)

    Votes: 1 3.2%
  • No. 14 Arizona State (6-0)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No. 15 Cincinnati (6-0)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No. 16 Hawaii (6-0)

    Votes: 7 22.6%
  • No. 20 Kansas (5-0)

    Votes: 2 6.5%
  • Connecticut (5-0)

    Votes: 1 3.2%

  • Total voters
    31
H

hockeybeat

Guest
Because I have far too much free time, earlier today I thought about which teams would play for the mythical National Championship. And this year, maybe more than any other, might provide a real argument for a playoff if one (or more) of the Unbeaten Six don't play in the BCS title game.

Since I am an evil person who would enjoy the BCS being exposed as the fraud it is, I would love to see Hawaii-South Florida in New Orleans come January 7, 2008.
 
The Good Doctor said:
Probably Hawaii. But it still shouldn't sniff a BCS game.
Hawaii will have the same argument that Boise State had last year. They're a D-1 BCS team that finished unbeaten. Why shouldn't they play for a National Championship?

Do I think the Warriors could hang with LSU, Cal, Ohio State or South Florida? No way.
 
hockeybeat said:
The Good Doctor said:
Probably Hawaii. But it still shouldn't sniff a BCS game.
Hawaii will have the same argument that Boise State had last year. They're a D-1 BCS team that finished unbeaten. Why shouldn't they play for a National Championship?

Do I think the Warriors could hang with LSU, Cal, Ohio State or South Florida? No way.

Because they haven't played anyone, and have struggled to beat some of the cupcakes they have played.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
The Good Doctor said:
hockeybeat said:
The Good Doctor said:
Probably Hawaii. But it still shouldn't sniff a BCS game.
Hawaii will have the same argument that Boise State had last year. They're a D-1 BCS team that finished unbeaten. Why shouldn't they play for a National Championship?

Do I think the Warriors could hang with LSU, Cal, Ohio State or South Florida? No way.

Because they haven't played anyone, and have struggled to beat some of the cupcakes they have played.
I agree. But if they finish unbeaten, there will be people that argue for their inclusion in the BCS title game, especially if there are one-loss teams in the game.
 
Take them off the island and Hawaii would get stomped by just about every other team on that list. The Warriors don't play much defense. Boise was much more worthy of a BCS shot a year ago than Hawaii would be this year.
 
hockeybeat said:
The Good Doctor said:
Probably Hawaii. But it still shouldn't sniff a BCS game.
Hawaii will have the same argument that Boise State had last year. They're a D-1 BCS team that finished unbeaten. Why shouldn't they play for a National Championship?

Do I think the Warriors could hang with LSU, Cal, Ohio State or South Florida? No way.

It was an insipid argument last year, and will be even more so this year if it is made on Hawaii's behalf.
 
Rufino said:
hockeybeat said:
The Good Doctor said:
Probably Hawaii. But it still shouldn't sniff a BCS game.
Hawaii will have the same argument that Boise State had last year. They're a D-1 BCS team that finished unbeaten. Why shouldn't they play for a National Championship?

Do I think the Warriors could hang with LSU, Cal, Ohio State or South Florida? No way.

It was an insipid argument last year, and will be even more so this year if it is made on Hawaii's behalf.

I don't know how insipid it was when Boise State beat the Big XII champion. I'm not convinced Boise State would have lost to Ohio State. Though I do agree UH has done absolutely nothing to warrant BCS bowl consideration.
 
Dangerous_K said:
Rufino said:
It was an insipid argument last year, and will be even more so this year if it is made on Hawaii's behalf.
I don't know how insipid it was when Boise State beat the Big XII champion. I'm not convinced Boise State would have lost to Ohio State. Though I do agree UH has done absolutely nothing to warrant BCS bowl consideration.
Sorry, it was a great game, but a win on a gimmick play against a good but not great Oklahoma doesn't sell me on Boise State. Until the smurf turf guys can beat anyone from a BCS school on the road, they can not seriously be considered as a contender to be one of the best two teams in the country. They had a chance again this year, and they failed again.
 
This year there's no way Boise deserves or gets a BCS bowl bid, but last year they routed the Pac-10's third placed team, a team that beat USC, 42-14. I'm not saying BSU should have been in the title game by any means, but they just might have been as good as Ohio State. Certainly not Florida, but maybe Ohio State. No way last year's Boise is in the same category as this year's Hawaii.
 
I voted like a fanboy looser, but I really think USF has a decent shot. I'd love to see KU and Mizzou meet up in Arrowhead both undefeated. It's possible, but not likely. KU hasn't enjoyed success long enough not to have at least one slip up and Mizzou is coached by Gary Pinkel.
 
Jake_Taylor said:
I voted like a fanboy looser, but I really think USF has a decent shot. I'd love to see KU and Mizzou meet up in Arrowhead both undefeated. It's possible, but not likely. KU hasn't enjoyed success long enough not to have at least one slip up and Mizzou is coached by Gary Pinkel.

I'm with you here, all the way.
 
If you're including bowl games I'll go with Hawaii. Really weak schedule (I don't think they get a BCS bid) and playing at home against Kansas or Oklahoma State shouldn't be too hard.
 
DanOregon said:
If you're including bowl games I'll go with Hawaii. Really weak schedule (I don't think they get a BCS bid) and playing at home against Kansas or Oklahoma State shouldn't be too hard.

I don't think any of the undefeated teams left play at home against Kansas and Oklahoma State.
 
Jake_Taylor said:
DanOregon said:
If you're including bowl games I'll go with Hawaii. Really weak schedule (I don't think they get a BCS bid) and playing at home against Kansas or Oklahoma State shouldn't be too hard.

I don't think any of the undefeated teams left play at home against Kansas and Oklahoma State.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think he's saying they'll get a bid to their own bowl and play one of those teams.
 
Explanatory. I tried to go in and fix but I can't modify the actual poll.

Carry on.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top