More Fun from Missouri ...

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

It's like an idea you think is good for maybe five seconds until you think through the mechanics of how it would work and realize it's dumb. And that's the kindest spin I can imagine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ace
It'll be necessary under President Trump, because Muslims will not be allowed to drive
 
I don't think this invades privacy. It would require the cops to list their impressions of the people they stop.

But that would involved the cops having gaydar and being honest, that they are stopping all minorities or something.

Sounds like a good idea but a bad law.

Unless they're having homosex while they're driving, or while blocking a crowded intersection, how is sexual orientation any of the cops' business?

Same for religion. And disability - disabled people drive all the time without incident.

I could maybe see language skills being relevant to obeying street signs.
 
Unless they're having homosex while they're driving, or while blocking a crowded intersection, how is sexual orientation any of the cops' business?

Same for religion. And disability - disabled people drive all the time without incident.

I could maybe see language skills being relevant to obeying street signs.

I don't think the idea is to see what protected class is the worst road hazard. I believe it's meant to make sure police aren't profiling gays or Jews or dyslexics for traffic violations.

But you may be onto something.
 
This whole idea is great.

Liberals want to track every microaggression committed against a minority of any type. But, asking law enforcement to categorize folks so we can track such things is in itself a microaggression.

Talk about irony! Or Something. Maybe sarcasm.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
I don't think the idea is to see what protected class is the worst road hazard. I believe it's meant to make sure police aren't profiling gays or Jews or dyslexics for traffic violations.

I fail to see how collecting MORE irrelevant information will accomplish this.
 
I think libs and conservatives can all agree that this is a stupid idea as presented.

Except for the fact that is has bipartisan sponsorship, and the support of the ACLU, everyone hates it.
 
Except for the fact that is has bipartisan sponsorship, and the support of the ACLU, everyone hates it.

I didn't say everyone hates it. I said it's stupid. Americans like lots of stupid stuff.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top