dixiehack
Well-Known Member
It's like an idea you think is good for maybe five seconds until you think through the mechanics of how it would work and realize it's dumb. And that's the kindest spin I can imagine.
I don't think this invades privacy. It would require the cops to list their impressions of the people they stop.
But that would involved the cops having gaydar and being honest, that they are stopping all minorities or something.
Sounds like a good idea but a bad law.
And maybe there is a way to indicate what religion a person is. Like if you are Jewish maybe there is a symbol you could wear.
Unless they're having homosex while they're driving, or while blocking a crowded intersection, how is sexual orientation any of the cops' business?
Same for religion. And disability - disabled people drive all the time without incident.
I could maybe see language skills being relevant to obeying street signs.
I don't think the idea is to see what protected class is the worst road hazard. I believe it's meant to make sure police aren't profiling gays or Jews or dyslexics for traffic violations.
I fail to see how collecting MORE irrelevant information will accomplish this.
I think libs and conservatives can all agree that this is a stupid idea as presented.
Except for the fact that is has bipartisan sponsorship, and the support of the ACLU, everyone hates it.