More Cuts at ESPN

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
ESPN is doing to sports the same thing MTV did to music
MTV did a lot of good for music. Exposed people to a lot of artists they might not have otherwise heard. Sure, they turned some artists into videographers over songwriters, but you'd be hard-pressed to argue that MTV wasn't an overall boon to music. Hasn't ESPN done the same in many ways? Exposed people to sports and players who might otherwise have been marginalized? I guess at a certain point there is oversaturation. And also, there are competing providers -- Napster, most prominently in music; cord-cutters with ESPN -- that undermine the near monopoly on content providing.

I can see the relation of ESPN to MTV in that regard. MTV is now a shell of itself, and to listen to the likes of Clay Travis, ESPN is following suit. So yup, I can see the analogy.
 
We're actually hoping someone loses a job? Yeesh.
Well, I figure he'll land somewhere else and maybe change his act a bit. He did follow Czaban on radio once, and the ratings went down the tubes.

I couldn't stand Bayless either, and he landed nicely (and onto a channel I rarely watch). Didn't he also get paid more?

Slightly changing subjects - if this trend at ESPN continues, I imagine TV rights payments might go down, and athletes eventually get paid less too?
 
Last edited:
I like SAS most times, he can be overbearing but usually like listening to him. If he is let go by the WWL he should be OK, unless he took investing advice from Len Dykstra or Mike Tyson.
 
I've heard SAS be entirely reasonable and somewhat charming in interviews with other sports radio hosts. My opinion of him was entirely the opposite of what I felt watching him on TV.
 
This is going to be sad, because some really good people will be out of work.

ESPN got way too big. It just did, and it threw money at people and projects that were and are more larks than they are solid, sustainable, important journalism.
 
Will SAS take over for Rusillo and Kanell nationally? Seems like an easy cost saving, not that I am advocating for it.

ESPN's CFB and NFL coverage always seemed bloated. They have cut back recently, but it's still an area that seems ripe for some trimming.
 
MTV did a lot of good for music. Exposed people to a lot of artists they might not have otherwise heard. Sure, they turned some artists into videographers over songwriters, but you'd be hard-pressed to argue that MTV wasn't an overall boon to music. Hasn't ESPN done the same in many ways? Exposed people to sports and players who might otherwise have been marginalized? I guess at a certain point there is oversaturation. And also, there are competing providers -- Napster, most prominently in music; cord-cutters with ESPN -- that undermine the near monopoly on content providing.

I can see the relation of ESPN to MTV in that regard. MTV is now a shell of itself, and to listen to the likes of Clay Travis, ESPN is following suit. So yup, I can see the analogy.

I say this every time it comes up, but Clay Travis works for Fox and has a vested interest in ESPN's failure. Where are all his 800-word treatises on Fox Sports 1's ****ty ratings?
 
Hate to see anyone lose their job. Lots of people I disagree with or just don't like in this biz. But this always sucks.

It's just a reminder no place is safe.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top