B
broadway joe
Guest
bostonbred said:It's my opinion that the vast majority of people don't care about Hill's constant race ramblings. I think so many articles hitting on the same subject hurts her credibility. Enough is enough already.beardpuller said:bostonbred said:Because everything she writes seems to be about race.Lester Bangs said:She wrote a column. It wasn't bad. I don't get the fuss.
The vast majority of people just do not care. It's beyond stale.
My view: There is nothing wrong with this column.
Maybe the vast majority of WHITE people don't care. And if you don't care, then don't read it.
That was all I was going to say, but what the heck: Who appointed you as the spokesman for the vast majority of people?
I don't have a strong feeling about Jemele Hill one way or the other. I'm actually baffled by why she gets so much attention on this board. But I've read enough of her stuff to know that the idea that she's a one-trick pony who writes about race all the time is flat out wrong. Like Rhoden, people on here seem to think she's obsessed with race because those are the only columns they ever notice. Check her archives. Before this, her previous columns had been on the fan who caught Bonds' record-breaking HR, Michael Phelps, Erin Andrews, the average fan getting priced out of going to games, the HS hoops kid who's going to play in Europe, Michelle Wie, the NBA's Western Conference being overrated, etc. But then she writes something that does have to do with race and suddenly she's obsessed. Very unfair.
And the column in question is fine. Not horrible, not great. She took a stance and supported it, maybe not as well as she could have. People may strongly disagree with her opinion, but that doesn't make it a bad column. Could it have been better? Of course. But the harshness of the criticism is unwarranted.