The Big Ragu
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2002
- Messages
- 30,281
I didn't see this until this morning:
I am sure there are going to be different opinions about this, although I personally don't get it. I read it like it was something out of the Onion; clueless millenial entitlement gone awry. I know others will read it in terms of what she is owned in life at the expense of someone else: fairness, a "living wages," etc. Or maybe not. She sounded so ridiculous to me, I was wondering if she could really be anyone's poster child for socialist doctrine.
In any case, she made a choice to live in one the costliest places in the country on a $12-an-hour paycheck (a job she willingly applied for and took). And then wrote a whiny, snarky open letter to the CEO whining about her life (her expensive rent, the internet connection and phone she can't afford, and all the rice she has to eat to get by) and her pay (calling out the guy who started and grew the company about his net worth.).
She is no longer employed by him.
I am sure there are going to be different opinions about this, although I personally don't get it. I read it like it was something out of the Onion; clueless millenial entitlement gone awry. I know others will read it in terms of what she is owned in life at the expense of someone else: fairness, a "living wages," etc. Or maybe not. She sounded so ridiculous to me, I was wondering if she could really be anyone's poster child for socialist doctrine.
In any case, she made a choice to live in one the costliest places in the country on a $12-an-hour paycheck (a job she willingly applied for and took). And then wrote a whiny, snarky open letter to the CEO whining about her life (her expensive rent, the internet connection and phone she can't afford, and all the rice she has to eat to get by) and her pay (calling out the guy who started and grew the company about his net worth.).
She is no longer employed by him.