Mariotti re-ups with Sun Times

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

suburbia

Active Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2004
Messages
4,431
Sorry if this is a DB...

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/mariotti/1009921,jay061708.article
 
get a load of this quote from Jay, in the story linked above:

"The Sun-Times provides for a strong base from which to connect with readers while I continue my television work and branch into other broadcast and Web ventures."
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Yeah. Why would they want to keep on board somebody who A. Sends the Web hits skyrocketing like a pinball machine B. Writes four times a week, without fail, never mails in a column and travels all over the place and C. Is all over national television for a half-hour every day?

Look, some of the **** the guy writes infuriates me, as well. But to act like he doesn't have value to the Sun-Times - which isn't, by the way, exactly The New Yorker to begin with - is crazy. He's their franchise.
 
WaylonJennings said:
Yeah. Why would they want to keep on board somebody who A. Sends the Web hits skyrocketing like a pinball machine B. Writes four times a week, without fail, never mails in a column and travels all over the place and C. Is all over national television for a half-hour every day?

Look, some of the **** the guy writes infuriates me, as well. But to act like he doesn't have value to the Sun-Times - which isn't, by the way, exactly The New Yorker to begin with - is crazy. He's their franchise.


Don't unfairly abuse the Sun-Times. Their local news coverage has historically beaten the living crap out of the Trib with awesome regularity. It's a tragedy what Connie Black did to that paper.
 
I'll take Couch over Jay or Telander 90 percent of the time.

But Jay is the franchise. Count me among those who prefer the Sun-Times to the Tribune any day of the week.
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
I'll take Couch over Jay or Telander 90 percent of the time.

But Jay is the franchise. Count me among those who prefer the Sun-Times to the Tribune any day of the week.

Shouldn't that sort of assessment -- and I'm not disagreeing with it one bit -- make the folks (left) at Tribune Tower feel pretty stupid? Considering the disparity in resources, space, staffing, etc.?
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
I'll take Couch over Jay or Telander 90 percent of the time.

But Jay is the franchise. Count me among those who prefer the Sun-Times to the Tribune any day of the week.

I don't know. Couch seems like Jay Jr. a lot of days. Rip, rip, rip, rip. Fire, fire, fire. Shred, shred, shred. I think he's a little more surgical with it, obviously. And he takes on some issues with a little more nuance.
 
Joe Williams said:
Mizzougrad96 said:
I'll take Couch over Jay or Telander 90 percent of the time.

But Jay is the franchise. Count me among those who prefer the Sun-Times to the Tribune any day of the week.

Shouldn't that sort of assessment -- and I'm not disagreeing with it one bit -- make the folks (left) at Tribune Tower feel pretty stupid? Considering the disparity in resources, space, staffing, etc.?

All the way to the bank, it will. They'll have driven the Sun-Times out of business within five years with their free RedEye tab.
 
Couch gets major props and a lot of slack from my Chicago sources because of his work on the Cubs' ticket-scalping scandal.

Mariotti gets zero slack and utter disdain from those same folks. And they're working class South Siders, right in the Sun-Times' wheelhouse.
 
Joe Williams said:
Mizzougrad96 said:
I'll take Couch over Jay or Telander 90 percent of the time.

But Jay is the franchise. Count me among those who prefer the Sun-Times to the Tribune any day of the week.

Shouldn't that sort of assessment -- and I'm not disagreeing with it one bit -- make the folks (left) at Tribune Tower feel pretty stupid? Considering the disparity in resources, space, staffing, etc.?

I don't think the Trib has ever fully recovered from the Michael Holley and Skip Bayless experiments. I like Holley a lot and even if you don't like Skip, he's rarely boring.

They never found an adequate replacement for Bernie. Morrissey is an outstanding writer, but columns aren't his strength. Missy never should have been writing columns either. Downey is nowhere close to as good as he was when he was in LA.

A paper that size needs a must-read columnist and they haven't had one in quite some time.
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
Joe Williams said:
Mizzougrad96 said:
I'll take Couch over Jay or Telander 90 percent of the time.

But Jay is the franchise. Count me among those who prefer the Sun-Times to the Tribune any day of the week.

Shouldn't that sort of assessment -- and I'm not disagreeing with it one bit -- make the folks (left) at Tribune Tower feel pretty stupid? Considering the disparity in resources, space, staffing, etc.?

I don't think the Trib has ever fully recovered from the Michael Holley and Skip Bayless experiments. I like Holley a lot and even if you don't like Skip, he's rarely boring.

They never found an adequate replacement for Bernie. Morrissey is an outstanding writer, but columns aren't his strength. Missy never should have been writing columns either. Downey is nowhere close to as good as he was when he was in LA.

A paper that size needs a must-read columnist and they haven't had one in quite some time.


Downey's on cruise control. He can write . . . he's a pro . . . but the passion's wholly absent.
 
Ben_Hecht said:
Mizzougrad96 said:
Joe Williams said:
Mizzougrad96 said:
I'll take Couch over Jay or Telander 90 percent of the time.

But Jay is the franchise. Count me among those who prefer the Sun-Times to the Tribune any day of the week.

Shouldn't that sort of assessment -- and I'm not disagreeing with it one bit -- make the folks (left) at Tribune Tower feel pretty stupid? Considering the disparity in resources, space, staffing, etc.?

I don't think the Trib has ever fully recovered from the Michael Holley and Skip Bayless experiments. I like Holley a lot and even if you don't like Skip, he's rarely boring.

They never found an adequate replacement for Bernie. Morrissey is an outstanding writer, but columns aren't his strength. Missy never should have been writing columns either. Downey is nowhere close to as good as he was when he was in LA.

A paper that size needs a must-read columnist and they haven't had one in quite some time.


Downey's on cruise control. He can write . . . he's a pro . . . but the passion's wholly absent.

I thought it was an outstanding hire when they made it. Now, not so much.
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
Joe Williams said:
Mizzougrad96 said:
I'll take Couch over Jay or Telander 90 percent of the time.

But Jay is the franchise. Count me among those who prefer the Sun-Times to the Tribune any day of the week.

Shouldn't that sort of assessment -- and I'm not disagreeing with it one bit -- make the folks (left) at Tribune Tower feel pretty stupid? Considering the disparity in resources, space, staffing, etc.?

I don't think the Trib has ever fully recovered from the Michael Holley and Skip Bayless experiments. I like Holley a lot and even if you don't like Skip, he's rarely boring.

They never found an adequate replacement for Bernie. Morrissey is an outstanding writer, but columns aren't his strength. Missy never should have been writing columns either. Downey is nowhere close to as good as he was when he was in LA.

A paper that size needs a must-read columnist and they haven't had one in quite some time.

David Haugh should be their columnist.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top