Let this be a lesson to all you rogue satellites

  • Thread starter Thread starter beefncheddar
  • Start date Start date
Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

B

beefncheddar

Guest
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Pentagon says a Navy missile hit the spy satellite it was targeting over the Pacific Ocean and says it should know Thursday whether the spacecraft’s fuel tank was destroyed as planned.
 
DougDascenzo said:
By rogue satellites, do you mean Iran, Russia and North Korea?

No, I mean orbiting buckets of bolts that might wish to rain terror and toxic badness on our proud land. Let this be a lesson to all of them. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED, *******!
 
Ouch. I was watching the lunar eclipse, and something just hit me square in the noggin. For eternity, I'll now be known as the dude with NASA spelled backward in his forehead.
 
I HOPE WE DIDN'T UNWITTINGLY UNLEASH THE EVIL ROBOTS!

phantom_empire_robot.jpg


ARRRRGH!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Bubbler said:
I HOPE WE DIDN'T UNWITTINGLY UNLEASH THE EVIL ROBOTS!

phantom_empire_robot.jpg


ARRRRGH!

Is the robot wearing a skirt?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I like Conan's attempts to bring down the rogue raccoon better.
 
We have to bomb the rogue satellites up there so we don't have to fight them down here.
 
Inky_Wretch said:
So we'll just call you "ASAN" from now on?

And why weren't they blowing the whole damn thing up instead of just the fuel tank?
The rest of it will burn up in reentry, the fuel tank needed to be taken care of.
 
markvid said:
Inky_Wretch said:
So we'll just call you "ASAN" from now on?

And why weren't they blowing the whole damn thing up instead of just the fuel tank?
The rest of it will burn up in reentry, the fuel tank needed to be taken care of.

As a guy with a B.S. in aerospace engineering, including a couple semesters of astrodynamics, I have a hard time believing:

1) They were actual able to target the fuel tank specifically. Closing speed was something like 20,000 mph.
2) There's any concern about what survived and what didn't. Closing speed was something like 20,000 mph.
 
Del_B_Vista said:
markvid said:
Inky_Wretch said:
So we'll just call you "ASAN" from now on?

And why weren't they blowing the whole damn thing up instead of just the fuel tank?
The rest of it will burn up in reentry, the fuel tank needed to be taken care of.

As a guy with a B.S. in aerospace engineering, including a couple semesters of astrodynamics, I have a hard time believing:

1) They were actual able to target the fuel tank specifically. Closing speed was something like 20,000 mph.
2) There's any concern about what survived and what didn't. Closing speed was something like 20,000 mph.

What the hell are you doing in sports, nerdlinger? Get a real job!
 
Del_B_Vista said:
markvid said:
Inky_Wretch said:
So we'll just call you "ASAN" from now on?

And why weren't they blowing the whole damn thing up instead of just the fuel tank?
The rest of it will burn up in reentry, the fuel tank needed to be taken care of.

As a guy with a B.S. in aerospace engineering, including a couple semesters of astrodynamics, I have a hard time believing:

1) They were actual able to target the fuel tank specifically. Closing speed was something like 20,000 mph.
2) There's any concern about what survived and what didn't. Closing speed was something like 20,000 mph.
Not only that, there was talk of a fireball upon impact. How can anything burn in space when a) there is no oxygen, and b) it was a non-explosive warhead — essentially a bullet?

(reaching for the Reynolds Wrap)
 
Football_Bat said:
Del_B_Vista said:
markvid said:
Inky_Wretch said:
So we'll just call you "ASAN" from now on?

And why weren't they blowing the whole damn thing up instead of just the fuel tank?
The rest of it will burn up in reentry, the fuel tank needed to be taken care of.

As a guy with a B.S. in aerospace engineering, including a couple semesters of astrodynamics, I have a hard time believing:

1) They were actual able to target the fuel tank specifically. Closing speed was something like 20,000 mph.
2) There's any concern about what survived and what didn't. Closing speed was something like 20,000 mph.
Not only that, there was talk of a fireball upon impact. How can anything burn in space when a) there is no oxygen, and b) it was a non-explosive warhead — essentially a bullet?

(reaching for the Reynolds Wrap)

I think the satellite was actually in the upper atmosphere, on the brink of re-entry. Not a lot of oxygen, but some.
 
Football_Bat said:
Not only that, there was talk of a fireball upon impact. How can anything burn in space when a) there is no oxygen, and b) it was a non-explosive warhead — essentially a bullet?

(reaching for the Reynolds Wrap)

There's no oxygen in space, but rocket fuel "burns" in space because it depends on a chemical reaction that releases energy. You can have monopropellant fuel, simply one substance that you start to "burn" by introducing some catalyst creating thrust, or two-component fuels where you jam two substances together. The space shuttle's main engines, for example, simply combine liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen together, creating a potent chemical reaction that also yields water vapor as a byproduct.

When two objects collide at 20,000 mph, that's plenty of kinetic energy to stir up whatever's cookin' in there.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top