B
beefncheddar
Guest
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Pentagon says a Navy missile hit the spy satellite it was targeting over the Pacific Ocean and says it should know Thursday whether the spacecraft’s fuel tank was destroyed as planned.
DougDascenzo said:By rogue satellites, do you mean Iran, Russia and North Korea?
Bubbler said:I HOPE WE DIDN'T UNWITTINGLY UNLEASH THE EVIL ROBOTS!
![]()
ARRRRGH!
Bubbler said:I HOPE WE DIDN'T UNWITTINGLY UNLEASH THE EVIL ROBOTS!
![]()
ARRRRGH!
The rest of it will burn up in reentry, the fuel tank needed to be taken care of.Inky_Wretch said:So we'll just call you "ASAN" from now on?
And why weren't they blowing the whole damn thing up instead of just the fuel tank?
markvid said:The rest of it will burn up in reentry, the fuel tank needed to be taken care of.Inky_Wretch said:So we'll just call you "ASAN" from now on?
And why weren't they blowing the whole damn thing up instead of just the fuel tank?
Del_B_Vista said:markvid said:The rest of it will burn up in reentry, the fuel tank needed to be taken care of.Inky_Wretch said:So we'll just call you "ASAN" from now on?
And why weren't they blowing the whole damn thing up instead of just the fuel tank?
As a guy with a B.S. in aerospace engineering, including a couple semesters of astrodynamics, I have a hard time believing:
1) They were actual able to target the fuel tank specifically. Closing speed was something like 20,000 mph.
2) There's any concern about what survived and what didn't. Closing speed was something like 20,000 mph.
Not only that, there was talk of a fireball upon impact. How can anything burn in space when a) there is no oxygen, and b) it was a non-explosive warhead — essentially a bullet?Del_B_Vista said:markvid said:The rest of it will burn up in reentry, the fuel tank needed to be taken care of.Inky_Wretch said:So we'll just call you "ASAN" from now on?
And why weren't they blowing the whole damn thing up instead of just the fuel tank?
As a guy with a B.S. in aerospace engineering, including a couple semesters of astrodynamics, I have a hard time believing:
1) They were actual able to target the fuel tank specifically. Closing speed was something like 20,000 mph.
2) There's any concern about what survived and what didn't. Closing speed was something like 20,000 mph.
Football_Bat said:Not only that, there was talk of a fireball upon impact. How can anything burn in space when a) there is no oxygen, and b) it was a non-explosive warhead — essentially a bullet?Del_B_Vista said:markvid said:The rest of it will burn up in reentry, the fuel tank needed to be taken care of.Inky_Wretch said:So we'll just call you "ASAN" from now on?
And why weren't they blowing the whole damn thing up instead of just the fuel tank?
As a guy with a B.S. in aerospace engineering, including a couple semesters of astrodynamics, I have a hard time believing:
1) They were actual able to target the fuel tank specifically. Closing speed was something like 20,000 mph.
2) There's any concern about what survived and what didn't. Closing speed was something like 20,000 mph.
(reaching for the Reynolds Wrap)
Football_Bat said:Not only that, there was talk of a fireball upon impact. How can anything burn in space when a) there is no oxygen, and b) it was a non-explosive warhead — essentially a bullet?
(reaching for the Reynolds Wrap)