MisterCreosote
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2010
- Messages
- 16,290
This happened a few days ago, but I thought we might be able to discuss it here. The Washington Post's website redesign now segregates its columnists into "left-leaning" and "right-leaning" categories. CJR's takedown:
http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/wapos_new_opinion_tabs_miss_th.php
First, if you need a label to tell you that E.J. Dionne is a liberal or that George Will is a conservative, you probably shouldn't be reading them anyway.
Second, one of our major problems these days that many, many people just disregard opinions, no matter how well thought out or reasoned, out of blind ideology.
Third, the CJR story brings up an interesting point, in essence saying that by doing this, every story these folks write about will be viewed as political first and foremost.
Rather, the Post’s tabs are troublesome because they expose the flawed measure that the mainstream media uses to quantify ideological diversity. Left versus right is only one of the ways that columnists can vary in their orientation, and arguably it is one of the less important.
Thoughts?
http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/wapos_new_opinion_tabs_miss_th.php
First, if you need a label to tell you that E.J. Dionne is a liberal or that George Will is a conservative, you probably shouldn't be reading them anyway.
Second, one of our major problems these days that many, many people just disregard opinions, no matter how well thought out or reasoned, out of blind ideology.
Third, the CJR story brings up an interesting point, in essence saying that by doing this, every story these folks write about will be viewed as political first and foremost.
Rather, the Post’s tabs are troublesome because they expose the flawed measure that the mainstream media uses to quantify ideological diversity. Left versus right is only one of the ways that columnists can vary in their orientation, and arguably it is one of the less important.
Thoughts?