LeBron on the cover of Vogue - controversy?

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Joined
Aug 18, 2005
Messages
14,163
Saw this on the opening page of JJobs.com.
Thought it was intersting... Is there a controversy?
Some are charging the cover is a stereotypical depiction of a black man as a savage and a (white) woman as a prize (so I guess we could also throw in the objectification of women as a sex objects as well).

http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2008/03/vogue-lebron-james-african-americans.php


The cover

giselelebronvogue.jpg



Thoughts?
 
My thought is that I would like to be Tom Brady for about eight seconds.
 
My first thought is either Gisele is extremely tall, or LeBron is hunched over while dribbling. LeBron is 6-8.

I didn't think of any other significance to the cover shoot. Mainly because I've moved on from that stereotype. I thought society largely had, too.
 
I wouldn't have viewed it like myself, but I can understand the argument. Interesting.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Football_Bat said:
My first thought is either Gisele is extremely tall, or LeBron is hunched over while dribbling. LeBron is 6-8.

I didn't think of any other significance to the cover shoot. Mainly because I've moved on from that stereotype. I thought society largely had, too.

I think I read that Gisele is 5-11, but more importantly, how much does she weigh?
 
Evil ... Thy name is Orville Redenbacher!! said:
Saw this on the opening page of JJobs.com.
Thought it was intersting... Is there a controversy?
Some are charging the cover is a stereotypical depiction of a black man as a savage and a (white) woman as a prize (so I guess we could also throw in the objectification of women as a sex objects as well).

http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2008/03/vogue-lebron-james-african-americans.php


The cover

giselelebronvogue.jpg



Thoughts?

Anybody charging that is just looking for a reason to be offended and needs to **** the hell off like right now.
 
Evil ... Thy name is Orville Redenbacher!! said:
Saw this on the opening page of JJobs.com.
Thought it was intersting... Is there a controversy?
Some are charging the cover is a stereotypical depiction of a black man as a savage and a (white) woman as a prize (so I guess we could also throw in the objectification of women as a sex objects as well).

People who think that probably also found the movie version of "Jesus Christ Superstar" racist because Judas was played by a black man (who continued to play Judas in the stage version up until his death a few years ago).
 
Secrets of the best bodies with the two of them standing close to each other. Sorry...don't see any controversy here.
 
kingcreole said:
Evil ... Thy name is Orville Redenbacher!! said:
Saw this on the opening page of JJobs.com.
Thought it was intersting... Is there a controversy?
Some are charging the cover is a stereotypical depiction of a black man as a savage and a (white) woman as a prize (so I guess we could also throw in the objectification of women as a sex objects as well).

People who think that probably also found the movie version of "Jesus Christ Superstar" racist because Judas was played by a black man (who continued to play Judas in the stage version up until his death a few years ago).

I think if people saw what some scientists believe Jesus REALLY looked like, they'd be shocked.
 
I see nothing wrong with this.

LeBron was a big guy coming out of high school. I couldn't believe he was his age when he entered the NBA. Dwight Howard as well. I think Howard is far more muscular than James, but LeBron is the superstar.
 
If they superimposed the Empire State building in the background and had him swatting biplanes instead of dribbling a basketball while carrying fair Giselle, I'd really have a problem.
 
Apparently the punchline of that old racist joke about how to keep five black guys "away" from a white woman isn't true ... ;)
 
I can see how it evokes imagry of Kong and Ann Darrow. That was actually the first thing I thought of. Of course, I always loved King Kong and thought of Kong as a sympathetic figure, so in my view it's a compliment. 8)

From an art perspective, the photo that ran is a much more dynamic photo than the alternate shot that website thinks is the less offensive shot.

I don't know ... it doesn't bother me, but then again, as a white guy, I've never been compared (in looks and intelligence) to a gorilla the way many black people and their parents have been.
 
Let me add that LeBron, the black man in question, doesn't seem to have a problem with it, so why should anyone else? He obviously didn't feel like he was being made to look like a savage or a gorilla.

There have been much more inflammatory depictions -- the Barkley cover on SI springs to mind (which was, of course, supposed to be provocative) -- that I thought were much ado about nothing, too.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top