Just when it seemed Reggie Bush had hit rock bottom...

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Status
Not open for further replies.

RokSki

New Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
5,431
...this LA Times article reports that his supposed would-be New Era Sports & Entertainment business partner Lloyd Lake is both cooperating with NCAA officials and will file a civil lawsuit against Bush this month:

http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-bush10oct10,1,3485948.story?coll=la-headlines-sports&ctrack=7&cset=true


If this report is true, Reggie Bush will have a lot more to be concerned about than filming his next commercial, his 2.9 yards per carry average this season, and his team's disastrous 0-4 start.

At stake also are Bush's finances, his reputation, USC's 2004 & 2005 victories and Bush's 2005 Heisman.

If Bush seeks commiseration, he need look no further to fellow former Trojan and likewise 2006 NFL draftee, Matt Leinart.

Leinart -- having already been reduced to a platooning role with Kurt Warner -- is now out for the remainder of the 2007 season with a broken collarbone.

The good news for Bush is that he is now the Saints featured running back. This development follows the season-ending injury to teammate Deuce McAllister.

The rap on Bush early this season is that he did not spend enough time in the offseason working on his game and his conditioning, instead choosing to focus on his prolific endorsement ventures.

If this was the case, then Saints fans (as well as Bush's sponsors) have to hope that any potential distractions generated from Lake's apparent lawsuit and his forthcoming discussions with NCAA officials will not similarly distract Bush, particularly as the team looks to him to help rescue their currently-winless 2007 campaign.
 
If you copy and paste from a website that has links bolded, does it bold as a post in these message boards?

Just my theory.
 
Moderator1 said:
Why the bold? Stop with the bold please.

I didn't realize my SJ 'bolding privileges' were under review. Is that a new SJ rule (no bolding in posts which does not meet with the moderators' approval), and does it apply just to me? I wouldn't want to be the subject of any selective SJ moderating.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
It's just annoying as hell and hard to read. And as long as those posts are, you don't want to make them any more difficult to slog through. Not a rule at all.
And I see you've borrowed your brother's snippy pills. It works for you about as well as it does for him.
 
RokSki said:
Moderator1 said:
Why the bold? Stop with the bold please.

I didn't realize my SJ 'bolding privileges' were under review. Is that a new SJ rule (no bolding in posts which does not meet with the moderators' approval), and does it apply just to me? I wouldn't want to be the subject of any selective SJ moderating.

I THINK IT WAS A POLITE REQUEST, SAME AS IF YOU WERE POSTING IN ALL CAPS.
 
Moderator1 said:
It's just annoying as hell and hard to read. And as long as those posts are, you don't want to make them any more difficult to slog through. Not a rule at all.
And I see you've borrowed your brother's snippy pills. It works for you about as well as it does for him.


I bold so that people can focus on the names/publications/media outlets which interest them, instead of having to read the whole, long post.

I'm trying to help the reader here.
 
New Era Sports & Entertainment
Lloyd Lake
Reggie Bush
Heisman.
Matt Leinart.
Kurt Warner
Deuce McAllister

Ah, yes, that helps me a lot. How does reading just the bold help anyone?
 
It's funny how we're capable of getting the gist in everyone else's posts without the boldface.
 
imjustagirl said:
New Era Sports & Entertainment
Lloyd Lake
Reggie Bush
Heisman.
Matt Leinart.
Kurt Warner
Deuce McAllister

Ah, yes, that helps me a lot. How does reading just the bold help anyone?

Maybe those are clues to a hidden puzzle, like the Jumble.
 
I'm sorry Flash. I don't quite understand. Do you mean the gist of everyone else's posts?
 
RokSki said:
If this was the case, then Saints fans (as well as Bush's sponsors) have to hope that any potential distractions generated from Lake's apparent lawsuit and his forthcoming discussions with NCAA officials will not similarly distract Bush, particularly as the team looks to him to help rescue their currently-winless 2007 campaign.

His posts read as some sort of sophomoric preview/rehash. Something a writer for TV Guide would write.
 
RokSki said:
Moderator1 said:
It's just annoying as hell and hard to read. And as long as those posts are, you don't want to make them any more difficult to slog through. Not a rule at all.
And I see you've borrowed your brother's snippy pills. It works for you about as well as it does for him.


I bold so that people can focus on the names/publications/media outlets which interest them, instead of having to read the whole, long post.

I'm trying to help the reader here.

You could help the reader by not writing, you know, the whole, long post.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top