It's Been Asked Before, But . . .

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Just say mound and avoid the situation.

Otherwise, I say pitchers mound. Both pitchers use it. Straight plural, no possession.
 
The bump /chipcarey

I can't tell you how much that ****ing term annoys me.
 
I would go with mound as well. It's like quarterback sack. You can't sack anyone but the quarterback so just say sack.

No one else has a mound with a rubber on it. So just say mound.

I would go with a possessive, if I used it, but I would go pitcher's. Only one pitcher can use it at a time.
 
Pete Incaviglia said:
Armchair_QB said:
The bump /chipcarey

I can't tell you how much that ****ing term annoys me.

What? The southpaw gets the pill tonight on the bump. What's wrong with that?

I'm going to stab you in the eye.
 
Ace said:
I would go with mound as well. It's like quarterback sack. You can't sack anyone but the quarterback so just say sack.

No one else has a mound with a rubber on it. So just say mound.

I would go with a possessive, if I used it, but I would go pitcher's. Only one pitcher can use it at a time.

Don't make me put you on blast.
 
The crafty southpaw hurler will take the mound and toe the rubber in this evening's tilt at the yard.
 
Armchair_QB said:
Pete Incaviglia said:
Armchair_QB said:
The bump /chipcarey

I can't tell you how much that ****ing term annoys me.

What? The southpaw gets the pill tonight on the bump. What's wrong with that?

I'm going to stab you in the eye.

Aside from the proverbial, "finish on her face" post, this was my favorite post I've read in a long time.
 
Sports Style Guide, my alternate-AP bible (thank you, Jennifer Swann, wherever you are), says "pitcher's mound."
 
SF_Express said:
Sports Style Guide, my alternate-AP bible (thank you, Jennifer Swann, wherever you are), says "pitcher's mound."

That's a fantastic book. I got it for Christmas several years ago and used it thoroughly when I started out.
 
Ace said:
I would go with mound as well. It's like quarterback sack. You can't sack anyone but the quarterback so just say sack.

That's something I need to tell the couple of coaches around here who insist on recording "running back sacks," which the rest of the world refers to as "tackles for loss".
 
apeman33 said:
That's something I need to tell the couple of coaches around here who insist on recording "running back sacks," which the rest of the world refers to as "tackles for loss".

Long as you brought it up ...

Is it "tackles for loss" or "tackles for losses?" Seems to me the former is a bad mix of plural and singular, but I think I'm in the minority (i.e.: wrong) on this.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top