Is Jeff Kent a Hall of Famer?

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Mizzougrad96

Active Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2002
Messages
56,139
.290
2,461 hits
377 HR - I believe most ever by a second baseman
1,518 RBI
Despised by his teammates and media.

My initial reaction is yes.

Thoughts?
 
My initial reaction is he doesn't pass the "I know it when I see it" test, but I think he gets in eventually.

And damn. I did not realize he only spent six years with the Giants.
 
no way he gets in under my watch. oh, wait, i'm not on watch.

but still, NO WAY.

lousy second baseman. to me, a second baseman or shortstop must be good-to-great defensively to start, then have exceptional offensive numbers for a second baseman.

based on his lack of leather, i'd argue his offensive numbers better be up to the standard i'd hold a corner infielder or outfielder. so again, NO...

i couldn't care less that he was a redneck ****. i'll leave that for the baseball writers he pissed off during his hall-of-the-very good career.

gosh, let's try to maintain the standards, people.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
shockey said:
no way he gets in under my watch. oh, wait, i'm not on watch.

but still, NO WAY.

lousy second baseman. to me, a second baseman or shortstop must be good-to-great defensively to start, then have exceptional offensive numbers for a second baseman.

based on his lack of leather, i'd argue his offensive numbers better be up to the standard i'd hold a corner infielder or outfielder. so again, NO...

i couldn't care less that he was a redneck ****. i'll leave that for the baseball writers he pissed off during his hall-of-the-very good career.

gosh, let's try to maintain the standards, people.

Kent wasn't great defensively, by any means, but he's not as bad as you're making him out to be.

For his career, his net dWAR is -.8, meaning he cost his team about a win defensively during the entirety of his career. Given how long he played, I think we can say he was, probably, average.
 
That was per BR. Fangraphs has him as a -18 dWAR guy, which is significantly different. It's hard enough to convince the ignorant to use logic and reason. It'd sure be nice if FG and BR could get on the same damn page.
 
Might make his high school hall of fame. Then again, I have pretty damn high standards when it comes to HOF. Jeff Kent was no Ted Williams, or even Joe Morgan.
 
Mark2010 said:
Might make his high school hall of fame. Then again, I have pretty damn high standards when it comes to HOF. Jeff Kent was no Ted Williams, or even Joe Morgan.
Christ, then your hall of fame might have 10 people in it if you're comparing him to Ted Williams.
 
BYH said:
My initial reaction is he doesn't pass the "I know it when I see it" test, but I think he gets in eventually.

This is pretty much how I see it. Not that my opinion matters for jack ****.
 
I think he makes it based on the Hall of Fame achievement of making Barry Bonds look like the reasonable one.
 
Gene Parmesan said:
That was per BR. Fangraphs has him as a -18 dWAR guy, which is significantly different. It's hard enough to convince the ignorant to use logic and reason. It'd sure be nice if FG and BR could get on the same damn page.

Yeah. I mean, if we can't get properly aligned dWAR, how will we ever know who was a good baseball player?
 
LongTimeListener said:
Gene Parmesan said:
That was per BR. Fangraphs has him as a -18 dWAR guy, which is significantly different. It's hard enough to convince the ignorant to use logic and reason. It'd sure be nice if FG and BR could get on the same damn page.

Yeah. I mean, if we can't get properly aligned dWAR, how will we ever know who was a good baseball player?

Sounds like a buncha sdfjsdjfaej
 
CarltonBanks said:
Only if he goes in wearing an Indians cap.
In hindsight the Indians should have held onto him rather than flipping him for one year of Matt Williams.
 
LongTimeListener said:
Gene Parmesan said:
That was per BR. Fangraphs has him as a -18 dWAR guy, which is significantly different. It's hard enough to convince the ignorant to use logic and reason. It'd sure be nice if FG and BR could get on the same damn page.

Yeah. I mean, if we can't get properly aligned dWAR, how will we ever know who was a good baseball player?

Sorry my process isn't as true as the ol' eye test.
 
I'd agree with yes but after Alomar and yes he should thank Bonds. Bonds probably should've had the MVP that Kent won also.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top