A
ADifferentOkie
Guest
This wonderful chain has put on a hiring freeze, one can only assume to save money.
I'm not an economist, but I don't understand how you save money by not rehiring when someone leaves.
If it's an ad person (which they are not hiring at the moment), you are giving up money hand over fist.
If it's a reporter, you are losing out on local coverage, which certainly plays a part in driving subscribership.
Does anyone have any idea what they are actually thinking, and if there is some sort of timetable with this?
And we wonder why papers are losing readers...
I'm not an economist, but I don't understand how you save money by not rehiring when someone leaves.
If it's an ad person (which they are not hiring at the moment), you are giving up money hand over fist.
If it's a reporter, you are losing out on local coverage, which certainly plays a part in driving subscribership.
Does anyone have any idea what they are actually thinking, and if there is some sort of timetable with this?
And we wonder why papers are losing readers...