On Tuesday, June 5, an apology appeared on page 2-E of the Baltimore Sun's sports section courtesy of Sun reporter and fantasy sports columnist Childs Walker.
"An article on LeBron James' performance in the NBA playoffs...contained a term that is derogatory...I'm embarrassed by my ignorance of the offending term, and I sincerely apologize for using it," wrote Walker.
This was what was written in the early edition of the Sun on June 2.
"There aren't many true prodigies, and the chance to catch one coming to full bloom is rarer still. But LeBron James did just that, hitting shot after shot in one of the great playoff performances in memory. At times, he rumbled through a good Pistons defense like a tank through spearchucker."
So, the question I ask is how a term as archaic and blatantly racist as "spearchucker," can make it onto the sports page of a major metropolitan newspaper in 2007?
"An article on LeBron James' performance in the NBA playoffs...contained a term that is derogatory...I'm embarrassed by my ignorance of the offending term, and I sincerely apologize for using it," wrote Walker.
This was what was written in the early edition of the Sun on June 2.
"There aren't many true prodigies, and the chance to catch one coming to full bloom is rarer still. But LeBron James did just that, hitting shot after shot in one of the great playoff performances in memory. At times, he rumbled through a good Pistons defense like a tank through spearchucker."
So, the question I ask is how a term as archaic and blatantly racist as "spearchucker," can make it onto the sports page of a major metropolitan newspaper in 2007?