DyePack said:
EE94 said:
bogie said:
The best thing that ever happened to me in this business was receiving a hand-written and very hateful letter from an editor at the Wall Street Journal who ripped me a new asshole just for having the temerity to ask him for a job when I obviously didn't have the experience, the resume, etc. to work for him.
It was savage.
I took it very personally.
And I took it as a challenge to become better at what I did. In the long run, it served as a great motivator to work hard and raise my game.
The WSJ guy who was such a prick to me got let go a couple of years later.Â
The guy shouldn't have been so prickish, but I can understand his frustration when applications that clearly don't qualify take up time.
I've received more than my share of letters - and worse, phone calls - from people straight out of college who feel qualified to work at a large daily - on the biggest beat, no less - because they have followed the local team since they were in diapers and because they wrote for their college paper.
I have often wanted to rip off a letter like your WSJ guy saying "Get a clue" but had the decency not to.
If that letter motivated you and served as a wakeup call, you should be, in a weird way, grateful to the guy for telling it like it is.
Total, complete bull****.
****tards are hired every day to positions they never should be within pissing distance of.
For any dumbass hiring executive to have the temerity to tell someone they are not qualified based on the hiring that does happen is simply asinine.
Dead. On. Nails.
I'd of phrased it a little differently than Dye, but he couldn't be more right.
It's called class. Too many people in this business lack it.
I used to have the bathroom to my college apartment wallpapered with my rejections letters. Even had them in rough geographic order, with the classy ones from SportsJournalists.com denizen Pete Wevurski and Jeff Jordan, formerly of the Spokane Spokesman-Review in one corner and the snide, condescending ones (typically from New England papers) in the other.
I'll never forget one, from a small/mid-sized Massachusetts paper that borders a body of water. The SE basically said that you're not good enough to work here, you'll never be good enough to work here and why are you even wasting my time applying to my holy shrine of a sports department.
Keep in mind, this wasn't the Boston Globe or Hartford Courant. It was a 40k paper.
A decade or so later, a buddy of mine at the LA Times tells me to apply to a paper in the Northwest that a former cohort of his works at. I do... but make the mistake of sending some clips to their "hiring and development editor" (now if there's a Supreme Being presiding over all these newspaper cutbacks, this person will be the next one to fall on her sword). She answers back with this snotty letter saying that "I haven't read your clips, but you oughta get some experience at a bigger paper before applying here."
This, coming from the same paper that had a 20something covering golf at the time.
You know something, EE94. There are people on this board who are in their 20s and 30s who can write and report circles around people you work with, so I'd back off the "get a clue" attitude just a bit. I"m not saying that every person deigning to apply to your journalistic Mt. Olympus is qualified to work there, but perhaps if you took the time to actually READ what some people are sending you instead of turning up your nose, you'd be pleasantly surprised.