RickStain said:The No. 3 one is pretty iffy. The law was vague and *could* be interpreted that way, but as soon as that was pointed out, the sponsor rewrote it.
Yeah, I'm sure it was just an oversight.
RickStain said:The No. 3 one is pretty iffy. The law was vague and *could* be interpreted that way, but as soon as that was pointed out, the sponsor rewrote it.
Oggiedoggie said:The guy has been in office since '96, through several elections.
This is is not his first screwball proposal.
Yet, he keeps winning elections.
That, not him, is what make me a bit depressed.
deskslave said:RickStain said:The No. 3 one is pretty iffy. The law was vague and *could* be interpreted that way, but as soon as that was pointed out, the sponsor rewrote it.
Yeah, I'm sure it was just an oversight.
deskslave said:RickStain said:The No. 3 one is pretty iffy. The law was vague and *could* be interpreted that way, but as soon as that was pointed out, the sponsor rewrote it.
Yeah, I'm sure it was just an oversight.
Smallpotatoes said:deskslave said:RickStain said:The No. 3 one is pretty iffy. The law was vague and *could* be interpreted that way, but as soon as that was pointed out, the sponsor rewrote it.
Yeah, I'm sure it was just an oversight.
Similar bills were proposed in Iowa and Nebraska.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/02/24/949245/-The-pro-life-bill-to-legalize-murder-spreads-to-Iowa-and-Nebraska
Bob Cook said:Someone should information these legislators that The Handmaid's Tale wasn't intended as an instruction manual.