Del_B_Vista said:
IMO, Feinstein's diploma plays a big part in his take on this issue. He's really invested in his school, and I'm not saying that's a bad thing, and he's got super-strong opinions on the Duke athletic department. He's got a hard-on for getting the AD fired, and that colors much of his opinion.
I won't defend Feinstein's take on the lacrosse case, but I will defend his criticism of Joe Alleva.
Alleva has been a disaster at Duke. In his first 12 months, he dumped both the football coach (who actually took them to a bowl, the only one they've earned since Steve Spurrier went to greener pastures) and the baseball coach, claiming he wasn't keeping a .500 coach.
It's pretty obvious to see that football hasn't done spit. Steve Traylor's successor as baseball coach ended up recruiting kids who were roiding up. Not helping the fact is the baseball program is in worse shape than it was under Traylor.
Oh yeah ... Alleva's son was on the baseball team. He was charged with driving while impaired his senior year at Duke. Alleva's son them compounded that idiocy with doing the same while driving a boat on a lake in the Triangle last year. That accident resulted in Joe Alleva needed 42 stitches to close up a gash in his head. Link is below ... :
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=2501915
And then there's the lacrosse fiasco. Guilty or no, the whole affair got unnecessarily messy. He then made painfully little effort to keep Gail Goestenkors. Time will tell if Joanne P. McCallie can work the same formula in Durham that worked well in East Lansing. If so, then Alleva will have actually gotten one right.
While some may view as cheap to take a swipe at Alleva with his preferred pick, his actions have done little to convince me that Feinstein's entirely wrong on that front.