Idaho said:I pose the question because it seems ESPN fits some of the talking points from the anti-Wal-Mart crowd (minus the poor pay) by being bigger, faster, cheaper and crappier in quality in many cases. It also seems to want to rule the world and dominate or drive out competitors.
Take it to the "Post a song you're listening to now" thread.dooley_womack1 said:![]()
Well, everybody wants to rule the world.
Idaho said:dominate or drive out competitors.
Frank_Ridgeway said:Idaho said:dominate or drive out competitors.
I don't see that. I don't see anything predatory about hiring people from a variety of newspapers; it doesn't seem that they're picking on any one news organization in particular. And I think they would need to add about 800 reporters to be able to compete for news evenly with large papers in every decent-size pro and major-college market.
Idaho said:Yes? No? Why or Why not?
Discuss
An experiment on my part. Just throwing a topic out, letting the masses have at it, if they want to, and waiting to see what happens and how it develops.
Ace said:Idaho said:I pose the question because it seems ESPN fits some of the talking points from the anti-Wal-Mart crowd (minus the poor pay) by being bigger, faster, cheaper and crappier in quality in many cases. It also seems to want to rule the world and dominate or drive out competitors.
Wal-Mart is evil
ESPN is an evil drunken frat boy
CNN/SI?jlee said:Frank_Ridgeway said:Idaho said:dominate or drive out competitors.
I don't see that. I don't see anything predatory about hiring people from a variety of newspapers; it doesn't seem that they're picking on any one news organization in particular. And I think they would need to add about 800 reporters to be able to compete for news evenly with large papers in every decent-size pro and major-college market.
I don't think I can name one mom 'n' pop operation that ESPN has caused to fold. Most of the other major sports broadcasters seem to be doing fine as well.