Steak Snabler
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2005
- Messages
- 24,628
Much stronger effort than his last. He actually takes the WWL to task a bit for fudging Craig James' role in the controversy:
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/story?columnist=ohlmeyer_don&id=4844048
In November, this column addressed the Steve Phillips affair and the fact ESPN was criticized for seeming to ignore, on its air, a messy sex scandal involving employees. Vince Doria, ESPN's senior vice president and director of news, noted at the time that "stories involving us are angst-ridden, and we recognize that we don't always do our best work on them. Fortunately, they don't come along too often."
Well, two months later, there comes another big story involving an ESPN analyst [James]. Cover those stories too much, and it might appear self-serving. Cover them too little, and it's deemed a cover-up. That's the reality and the curse for ESPN.
Controversies lurk around every corner, and conflicts are troublesome for any company. Of course, they're particularly dangerous if a large part of your business relies on being perceived by an audience as factual, fair and credible.
As ESPN grows, so will the conflicts. All the policies in the world won't cover the potential scenarios. The company needs to develop a hypersensitivity to such developments. News decisions in these cases must not be resolved by asking "What's permissible for the employee?" but rather "What's fair to the audience?"
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/story?columnist=ohlmeyer_don&id=4844048