ESPN dumping MLS Thursday night

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

poindexter

Well-Known Member
Bronze Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2002
Messages
29,699
http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/article/61231

Not a good sign for the fledgling league. Couldn't hold a regular spot.

Major League Soccer is not quite ready to carry its own night on TV.

After two years of anemic ratings that started low and finished lower, ESPN executives decided to cancel the league’s regular Thursday night telecast on ESPN2 this season. In its place, ESPN2 will carry an MLS game of the week, which will air on four different nights during the season. The weekly matches will occur on Thursdays (10 times), Saturdays (eight times), Wednesdays (six times) and Fridays (three times).

“We didn’t see the kind of ratings climb we’d like to, so we’re trying something different,” said Scott Guglielmino, ESPN vice president of programming.

The decision to cancel the regular Thursday night game marks a stunning turnaround for a league that two years ago believed it was creating destination programming that would increase interest in MLS. But even the 2007 arrival of David Beckham couldn’t boost MLS ratings.

MLS games averaged a 0.2 rating and 289,000 viewers on ESPN2 in 2007. Those numbers dropped to 0.2/253,000 viewers the following year. Its highest rating during that period was Beckham’s second regular-season game in August 2007 that earned a 0.6/658,000 households.

Canceling “MLS Primetime Thursday” is a tacit admission that MLS is not strong enough to anchor a regular prime-time slot on its own. ESPN is entering the third year of an eight-year rights deal that pays MLS $8 million annually.

“It’s not necessarily a detrimental thing for MLS,” said Derek Aframe, vice president of consulting at Octagon and former vice president of the New England Revolution. “What matters is where they stand at the end of six years when their deal is up (with ESPN).”

One reason ESPN made the move is to give the league better lead-in programming and more flexibility to telecast better matchups.

Rather than its previous lead-in — mainly taped programming — ESPN plans to program matches after college football, NIT basketball, the College World Series, motorsports and U.S. Open tennis. Promotion and marketing will be consistent with what has been provided in the past.

“(The change) works well for all parties,” said MLS spokesman Dan Courtemanche. “It provides better matchups for ESPN and provides flexibility for our clubs to put these games on nights that have more people in attendance.”

MLS team executives consistently said that Thursday night games were some of the hardest to sell, and it showed during broadcasts. Many games televised on ESPN2 featured swaths of empty seats. Even though average reported attendance for Thursday night games in 2008 was 5 percent higher than average season attendance, only three Thursday night games were sellouts and on average the games were played at stadiums filled to 68 percent of capacity.

“We feel (that with more flexibility) we can provide a much larger crowd and a much more festive atmosphere for the viewer,” Courtemanche said. “That should translate to better ratings.”

ESPN also said the move will allow it to feature more of the league’s marquee teams, like Chivas USA, the Los Angeles Galaxy and the Houston Dynamo, which weren’t able to play in their venues some Thursday nights during the school year because of various restrictions. The Galaxy and Chivas have an agreement with the California State University, Dominguez Hills, where the Home Depot Center is located, that limited the number of games they could play on weeknights when school was in session.

“The two big pieces here that we want to do better are with the lead-ins (especially those early windows on the East Coast) and the flexibility to cover different teams,” Guglielmino said. “We want to grow this as quickly as possible.”
 
What I found interesting is that the average attendance of games on Thursday night was higher than that of weekend games. I am not sure how that wasn’t able to translate into ratings.

Hopefully, the ratings will be better on a different day and that could become a featured airing day. I’m not too optimistic on it though since I consider it more likely that people will not know which day a game is on.
 
ESPN2 needs more broadcast slots for replays of poker matches.
 
Rather than its previous lead-in — mainly taped programming — ESPN plans to program matches after college football, NIT basketball, the College World Series, motorsports and U.S. Open tennis.

Amateur sports, racin' cars and tennis to the front of the line? **** you very much, ESPN.
 
I was hoping that Obama would mention saving the MLS as a priority in his speech
 
So if ESPN is going to show eight games on Saturday, are those going to be in the afternoon? They can't schedule it up against the FSC Saturday game.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
My biggest concern is that they end up missing most of a game because the baseball game before it went too long. Otherwise, I didn't think that the pre-game show was good at all.
 
Armchair_QB said:
Huh, and I thought soccer was really ready to take off in the country.

It's was never going to be a space shuttle take-off, more a hike up Everest. One step at a time, and in time, it'll find a regular slot again.
 
You didn't see the ratings you wanted from a single night, so you're trying something different by bouncing it all over the place?

That kind of thinking killed WKRP in Cincinnati, my all-time favorite show.
 
I think the league has finally got fans to care in some fashion. One only has to look at the emergence of the MLS fan culture to see the league made huge strides last season. Beckahm obviously was never going to be the answer in the long term, but it's sad to see another obstacle placed in front of soccer's climb.

I've said it on the soccer thread before. The first soccer boom in this country did not survive the Great Depression. MLS is going to have to be very careful with the moves it makes over the next few seasons. And it has to hope for a bona-fide superstar.
 
GB-Hack said:
Armchair_QB said:
Huh, and I thought soccer was really ready to take off in the country.

It's was never going to be a space shuttle take-off, more a hike up Everest. One step at a time, and in time, it'll find a regular slot again.

Soccer's been trying to take that step for more than 30 years.
 
MLS had a huge hill to climb in being played on Thursday night to begin with. We’re talking about the most watched television night of the week. This is when all of the networks put out their best television shows.

I’m not surprised the ratings weren’t higher. I’m disappointed.
 
Obviously, this isn't good news for the league, but the league is hardly in trouble. One of the expansion teams made money its first season. The teams that have their own stadiums do well. The ones that have to rent the NFL stadiums and are at their mercy as to what they will be charged, are not doing so well.

This is not the WNBA.
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
Obviously, this isn't good news for the league, but the league is hardly in trouble. One of the expansion teams made money its first season. The teams that have their own stadiums do well. The ones that have to rent the NFL stadiums and are at their mercy as to what they will be charged, are not doing so well.

This is not the WNBA.

The two that do rent from the NFL team, New England and Seattle, are have Kraft and Allen respectively among their ownership.

LA Galaxy, Chivas USA, FC Dallas, Colorado, Real Salt Lake, Columbus, Chicago, Toronto all have their own places, with New York's scheduled to open this season.

Kansas City and San Jose are scheduled to get theirs in either 2010 or '11, and the others are at smaller facilities, like Robertson Stadium for Houston as they try to get theirs.
 
playthrough said:
You didn't see the ratings you wanted from a single night, so you're trying something different by bouncing it all over the place?

That kind of thinking killed WKRP in Cincinnati, my all-time favorite show.

Ditto, for Twin peaks.

And Star Trek.

And a couple of others whose names escape me.

It's not shocking that ESPN is desperately looking for new ways to present MLS (note the lack of "the" in front of "MLS"). MLS just doesn't get the ratings. Stadiums are nice for the long-term financial viability, but the quality of play must continue to improve.

And I'm not sure how that will happen. Their expansion plan is reckless, as it will only further dilute a thin player pool.

But that's another thread.
 
Great news for Red Sox fans - more OB, less Dale Arnold on radio.
 
I don't think I'd call a league starting it's 13th season "fledgling."

The biggest problem MLS has faced is people thinking they should draw NFL size crowds. Only the 12-15 biggest clubs in Europe do, if that. When you see 15-20K in an NFL stadium, everybody wants to shout "See nobody shows," but now that most teams have size-specific stadiums, they are near sellouts with with crowds equaling NBA and NHL.
 
What the MLS should do is bring some big name players in from The Premier league like Dave Beckham.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top