Here's the list: http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=4375901
I would put TCU and Cincy in mine. Both have great coaches who seem committed to staying.
Also, Notre Dame wouldn't sniff my top 20. **** them.
I'm not exactly sure what the criteria was for this little exercise, but it certainly seems like there are some teams that could make some damn good arguments. Schlabach put Okie State in the top 25, which is fine based on what they were a year ago and what most expect them to be in the future, especially in 2009. But the Pokes hadn't done **** since joining the league in '96. Kansas has sucked until recently. And Kansas State, which I'd imagine wasn't even in the discussion, is a team that's had something like six 11-win seasons in the last 10 years or so and is the last North team to win a Big 12 title. That said, they'll probably suck until forever.
No real complaints with the SEC teams or the slotting. Same goes for the ACC. Was okay with the Big East aside from the Cincinnati omission -- though Pitt and Rutgers and USF probably deserve to be in the discussion.
Hated seeing Penn State in there over Michigan though I think the two schools are comparable. But if the criteria is based on what will happen in the future, I'd say Michigan is better equipped w/ Rich Rod than Penn State is with JoPa. Was glad to see Iowa get picked so high. An underrated program by my estimation. Hated seeing Wisconsin go that high. They've gotten worse each of the last three years and, like Forde said, might be headed for a sub-.500 season in '09.
Pac-10. Hmm. Hard to take Washington after an 0-12 season, but it's also hard to leave them out. Willingham set the program on fire but I don't think there's any doubt that they'll be back soon.
Overall, a fun list.