SnarkShark
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2013
- Messages
- 5,879
Jesus, Boom. All right. We get it.
BadgerBeer said:I have not stayed up to date on this situation. How many US citizens have died so far? Have another 40 or 50 people been infected in the last 24 hours? Very concerned.
Murphy: "Dr. Frieden, when we spoke on the phone the other day, you remained opposed to travel restrictions, because in your words, you said cutting commercial ties would hurt these fledgling democracies. Now is this the opinion of CDC? Is this your opinion or did someone also advise you, someone within the administration, someone in any other agencies, where did this opinion come from that that's of high importance?
Frieden: "My sole concern is to protect Americans. We can do that by continuing to take the steps we are taking here as well as to --
Murphy: "Did someone advise you on that, someone outside of yourself? Somebody else advise you that that's the position, we need to protect fledgling democracies?
Frieden: "My recollection of that conversation is that that discussion was in the context of our ability to stop the epidemic at the source.
JayFarrar said:YankeeFan said:Hopefully, Jay Farrar is not scratching his head, wondering why I'm quoting the guy from Caddy Shack.
One can only hope that you have an espresso machine install at Emory or that Dallas hospital's isolation ward. A nice frothy cup of ebola would do you some good.
YankeeFan said:Clearly racist decision.
Beneath the calming reassurance that President Obama has repeatedly offered during the Ebola crisis, there is a deepening frustration, even anger, with how the government has handled key elements of the response.
Those frustrations spilled over when Mr. Obama convened his top aides in the Cabinet room after canceling his schedule on Wednesday. Medical officials were providing information that later turned out to be wrong. Guidance to local health teams was not adequate. It was unclear which Ebola patients belonged in which threat categories.
“It’s not tight,” a visibly angry Mr. Obama said of the response, according to people briefed on the meeting. He told aides they needed to get ahead of events and demanded a more hands-on approach, particularly from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “He was not satisfied with the response,” a senior official said.
The difference between the public and private messages illustrates the dilemma Mr. Obama faces on Ebola — and a range of other national security issues — as he tries to galvanize the response to a public health scare while not adding to the sense of panic fueled by 24-hour cable TV and the nonstop Twitter chatter.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/18/us/amid-assurances-on-ebola-obama-is-said-to-seethe.html
It's not that its budget was slashed, it's that they were spending their money on dumb things such as a study on why lesbians are fat.Boom_70 said:cjericho said:3_Octave_Fart said:Great opening line:
Lockheed Martin thinks it may just about have a handle on this nuclear-fusion thing, but the U.S. government cannot manage to keep Ebola patients off a flight to Cleveland. Sometimes, you simply must hate the 21st century.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/390532/ebola-administration-kevin-d-williamson
They would've been able to keep those people off the flight if the CDC budget wasn't slashed.
Not seeing the connection. Why was CDC budget slashed?
YankeeFan said:When did the President have his first meeting with the CDC regarding the Ebola crisis?
Beneath the calming reassurance that President Obama has repeatedly offered during the Ebola crisis, there is a deepening frustration, even anger, with how the government has handled key elements of the response.
Those frustrations spilled over when Mr. Obama convened his top aides in the Cabinet room after canceling his schedule on Wednesday. Medical officials were providing information that later turned out to be wrong. Guidance to local health teams was not adequate. It was unclear which Ebola patients belonged in which threat categories.
“It’s not tight,” a visibly angry Mr. Obama said of the response, according to people briefed on the meeting. He told aides they needed to get ahead of events and demanded a more hands-on approach, particularly from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “He was not satisfied with the response,” a senior official said.
The difference between the public and private messages illustrates the dilemma Mr. Obama faces on Ebola — and a range of other national security issues — as he tries to galvanize the response to a public health scare while not adding to the sense of panic fueled by 24-hour cable TV and the nonstop Twitter chatter.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/18/us/amid-assurances-on-ebola-obama-is-said-to-seethe.html