There has never been a time when the main offensive player wasn't the "lone consideration".
Quarterbacks, always. When the running game was a bigger part of college football, running backs dominated the award.
I can't knock it. As a voter, there aren't many players more influential than the quarterback. It would take a phenomenal season for a defensive player to have similar influence.
Pretty much lost interest the year before when Orlando Pace finished fourth to Danny Weurffel, Troy Davis and Jake Plummer.Or an organized campaign by ESPN because they thought it would be neat for a DB to get it that year.
"This guy has played for so many schools that . . . (insert Hope punch line here)."
He's got 100,000 frequent-flyer miles in the transfer portal."This guy has played for so many schools that . . . (insert Hope punch line here)."
... his NIL package included frequent-flyer miles."This guy has played for so many schools that . . . (insert Hope punch line here)."
"This guy has played for so many schools that . . . (insert Hope punch line here)."
And while we're on the topic, can we get rid of using "Heisman Trophy candidate" as an ID for a player? My ****ing God. Every ****ing guy in ****ing shoulder pads is a ****ing Heisman Trophy candidate.
The oppressive ubiquity of betting content might actually be a boon on this front. Being able to say, "Jeff George, the second favorite for the Heisman Trophy, played as if he wore clown shoes onto the field" is a lot more informative than plastering him - and 90 bazillion other players - with a "Heisman Trophy candidate" ID.
You're trying to start another fight. You're wrong. Trust me, you're wrong.Then it’s laughable.
I guess ESPN does care more about niche college football. FCS. Sun Belt.