Smash Williams
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2008
- Messages
- 1,735
Last fall, our SE went on to a new job. Our corporate said we couldn't hire a new person, so the old ASE was promoted to SE and one of the writers became the new ASE. The new SE is a good editor in terms of finding typos and factual errors, and he's decent at laying out the section. He was a great ASE, a friendly guy who's been at the paper forever and had been ASE for several SEs who moved through the paper.
But now that he's in charge, we've found out he really struggles of long-term planning and at standing up for his writers. He lives so much in the day-to-day aspect of his job that he somehow can't see beyond things that are happening today or tomorrow. He also struggles with fighting for enough stringer money, space in the section, overtime pay or anything else where he has to go through management.
For example, he didn't budget the stringer money correctly this month because he doesn't have a calendar that tells him what's coming up. He covered everything early, even some things we could have done rewrites for, and now we can't cover things we really need to get in the paper because we have no writers. He doesn't communicate with our sister paper in the area to coordinate coverage, and he has a very bad habit of not telling us what he wants us to write until the day of. Last week, he told me the day before an off day we needed a story the next day and could I come in to write it? He'd known he wanted the story for a week but didn't tell anyone until the day before.
Basically, he's an ASE in SE's clothing. He's so caught up in what's happening on today's budget that he doesn't take time to plan the week or month ahead. He won't fill out a calendar, and he relies on other people to tell him what's happening on a week-by-week instead of taking the initiative himself and planning ahead. He also strolls in late, goofs off for a good portion of the day then complains at deadline time when he doesn't have everything done.
I started off trying to cover for him. I'd push him about getting coverage for big events in the near future that he'd forgotten about and make sure he knew when we'd need stringers. But with so many sports starting up, I don't have time to cover his butt anymore, and frankly I'm a bit tired of it.
The ASE and other writer on the staff are equally frustrated, but our editor doesn't care as long as we cover the school his kids play at in the playoffs. I suspect I should just let him sink on his own, but at the same time, I hate the idea of putting out an inferior section.
So those of you who have been there, how do you deal with a generally nice guy who should never have been promoted to his position? Do you cover for him, or do you let him dig his own grave so that someone finally comes in and makes him change?
But now that he's in charge, we've found out he really struggles of long-term planning and at standing up for his writers. He lives so much in the day-to-day aspect of his job that he somehow can't see beyond things that are happening today or tomorrow. He also struggles with fighting for enough stringer money, space in the section, overtime pay or anything else where he has to go through management.
For example, he didn't budget the stringer money correctly this month because he doesn't have a calendar that tells him what's coming up. He covered everything early, even some things we could have done rewrites for, and now we can't cover things we really need to get in the paper because we have no writers. He doesn't communicate with our sister paper in the area to coordinate coverage, and he has a very bad habit of not telling us what he wants us to write until the day of. Last week, he told me the day before an off day we needed a story the next day and could I come in to write it? He'd known he wanted the story for a week but didn't tell anyone until the day before.
Basically, he's an ASE in SE's clothing. He's so caught up in what's happening on today's budget that he doesn't take time to plan the week or month ahead. He won't fill out a calendar, and he relies on other people to tell him what's happening on a week-by-week instead of taking the initiative himself and planning ahead. He also strolls in late, goofs off for a good portion of the day then complains at deadline time when he doesn't have everything done.
I started off trying to cover for him. I'd push him about getting coverage for big events in the near future that he'd forgotten about and make sure he knew when we'd need stringers. But with so many sports starting up, I don't have time to cover his butt anymore, and frankly I'm a bit tired of it.
The ASE and other writer on the staff are equally frustrated, but our editor doesn't care as long as we cover the school his kids play at in the playoffs. I suspect I should just let him sink on his own, but at the same time, I hate the idea of putting out an inferior section.
So those of you who have been there, how do you deal with a generally nice guy who should never have been promoted to his position? Do you cover for him, or do you let him dig his own grave so that someone finally comes in and makes him change?