YankeeFan said:The second I saw the headline on Grantland, I knew this thread would follow.
Piotr Rasputin said:Stopped reading here:
"It's as though the Yankees and the Red Sox had (a) nuclear weapons and (b) an enduring blood-feud over the disputed territory of Stamford, Conn."
I'm SO glad they threw in a reference to our 'Merican sports, so we great unwashed masses could understand the Cricket World Cup!
rmanfredi said:Piotr Rasputin said:Stopped reading here:
"It's as though the Yankees and the Red Sox had (a) nuclear weapons and (b) an enduring blood-feud over the disputed territory of Stamford, Conn."
I'm SO glad they threw in a reference to our 'Merican sports, so we great unwashed masses could understand the Cricket World Cup!
So you shouldn't use comparisons to things that Americans understand in an article whose purpose was to explain cricket to Americans who are unfamiliar with the sport?
poindexter said:rmanfredi said:Piotr Rasputin said:Stopped reading here:
"It's as though the Yankees and the Red Sox had (a) nuclear weapons and (b) an enduring blood-feud over the disputed territory of Stamford, Conn."
I'm SO glad they threw in a reference to our 'Merican sports, so we great unwashed masses could understand the Cricket World Cup!
So you shouldn't use comparisons to things that Americans understand in an article whose purpose was to explain cricket to Americans who are unfamiliar with the sport?
Its so ****ing played out.
Piotr Rasputin said:poindexter said:rmanfredi said:Piotr Rasputin said:Stopped reading here:
"It's as though the Yankees and the Red Sox had (a) nuclear weapons and (b) an enduring blood-feud over the disputed territory of Stamford, Conn."
I'm SO glad they threw in a reference to our 'Merican sports, so we great unwashed masses could understand the Cricket World Cup!
So you shouldn't use comparisons to things that Americans understand in an article whose purpose was to explain cricket to Americans who are unfamiliar with the sport?
Its so ****ing played out.
Agreed.
Let it stand on its own merits. Explain it using your own literary skills, not through metaphor that treats the reader like they should only care if there's a reference to something they've heard of.
Mystery Meat II said:Of course, any opportunity to sneer at the unwashed flag-waving Murricuns, right?
Police responded about 8:40 p.m. Tuesday to a report of a fight in progress in the 3400 block of Thornwood Avenue, said Sgt. David Sostak of the Glenview Police Department.
About 10 people were said to be involved, Sostak said. When police arrived, they learned that about five people had been playing soccer when a vehicle pulled up to the field.
“Some (verbal) references to a gang were made,” Sostak said.
Several people, two of whom were wielding a golf club and a cricket paddle, exited the vehicle and attacked the soccer players, Sostak said.
http://triblocal.com/glenview/2011/06/17/gang-references-made-before-attack-with-golf-club-cricket-mallet-police-say/
Can you blame them? No one understand cricket.Piotr Rasputin said:Stopped reading here:
"It's as though the Yankees and the Red Sox had (a) nuclear weapons and (b) an enduring blood-feud over the disputed territory of Stamford, Conn."
I'm SO glad they threw in a reference to our 'Merican sports, so we great unwashed masses could understand the Cricket World Cup!
Double Down said:Piotr, I know it's part of your gimmick to get all huffy whenever the lay person talks about international sports in a condescending, Americanized way, but it's a comedy piece written (in part) by a Red Sox fan who used to run a comedy site about baseball. It's not attempting to explain, or relate to cricket in any meaningful way. Just to make people laugh. It's one thing to voice displeasure about the ESPN E-ticket cricket piece that compared India/Pakistian to SEC football, since there something totally, purposefully absurd.
It was a touch too long, but as someone who once watched cricket with a Pakistani friend, I thought there was a lot to chuckle about.