Colorado regents vote to close J-school

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Piotr Rasputin said:
JackS said:
I think it's still a reasonable expectation. I'm 25 years in and still going (the teaching is just on the side). And from what I gather from your posts, it's your choice that you're not still in the biz.

It's not an easy business; I know that. But if you're talented, persistent and FLEXIBLE, you can survive and even thrive.

I am JackS' eternal sense of optimism.

THE FIRST RULE OF JOURNALISM IS YOU DO NOT GO INTO JOURNALISM!
 
LongTimeListener said:
You are showing why people laugh when journalists try to do math. Just look at the numbers. You know, Brian Williams made a good living too, but that doesn't mean broadcast journalism was a great field to enter in the 1990s. This is the same thing.

And yes, I think everyone, particularly in a J-school, should be discouraged from entering. That is, they should be told that what awaits them is an extremely flooded pool of candidates and a likelihood that they will never make enough money to support themselves and a family. If they hear that and still want to go for it, fine, but I seriously question whether a 22-year-old is hearing that or whether the J-schools are lining their own pockets with these kids' misguided dreams. And if you think my version is a trope, then you have been spending way more time in an ivory tower than in a newsroom the past 10 years.

I also know people who lack one of your three necessary ingredients. But I know a lot who have them all and it doesn't matter.

Just remember what your position is advocating.

Let the untalented and lazy take over the industry (insert punchline about how they already have here) because no one encourages the talented and dogged to enter it.

See what kind of country we have then.
 
JackS said:
LongTimeListener said:
You are showing why people laugh when journalists try to do math. Just look at the numbers. You know, Brian Williams made a good living too, but that doesn't mean broadcast journalism was a great field to enter in the 1990s. This is the same thing.

And yes, I think everyone, particularly in a J-school, should be discouraged from entering. That is, they should be told that what awaits them is an extremely flooded pool of candidates and a likelihood that they will never make enough money to support themselves and a family. If they hear that and still want to go for it, fine, but I seriously question whether a 22-year-old is hearing that or whether the J-schools are lining their own pockets with these kids' misguided dreams. And if you think my version is a trope, then you have been spending way more time in an ivory tower than in a newsroom the past 10 years.

I also know people who lack one of your three necessary ingredients. But I know a lot who have them all and it doesn't matter.

Just remember what your position is advocating.

Let the untalented and lazy take over the industry (insert punchline about how they already have here) because no one encourages the talented and dogged to enter it.

See what kind of country we have then.

You say you're 25? Call me when you're 35 and have been in the rodeo a while. I was full of **** and ambition at 25 too. No one could tell me I wasn't going to make it at 25. Then I saw how obedience and ass-kissing trumped talent and flexibility for a decade.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
MisterCreosote said:
Mizzougrad96 said:
About five years ago, someone told me that 97 percent of print journalists will never make $50K in a year.

That seems impossible because almost everyone at a bigger paper makes $50K a year, but if you think of every other smaller and medium-sized paper, maybe it really is true.

I worked at two major-market papers in the decade I spent in the biz. I made less than $50,000/year for nine of those 10 years.

I think I've said this here before, but Mrs. C has students every now and then who want to be journalists, and I've talked to a few of them about what it's like. I don't explicitly tell them to run the other way, but that's what most of them do after hearing what it's really like.

I've had a few friends ask me to talk their kids out of going into journalism.
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
I've had a few friends ask me to talk their kids out of going into journalism.

I wouldn't do that. Talking a kid out of their dreams is often a losing proposition.

It's better to give as much honest information as possible, and allow them to make their own decisions.

Some will still do very well working in sports media. They just should avoid newspapers.
 
JackS said:
LongTimeListener said:
You are showing why people laugh when journalists try to do math. Just look at the numbers. You know, Brian Williams made a good living too, but that doesn't mean broadcast journalism was a great field to enter in the 1990s. This is the same thing.

And yes, I think everyone, particularly in a J-school, should be discouraged from entering. That is, they should be told that what awaits them is an extremely flooded pool of candidates and a likelihood that they will never make enough money to support themselves and a family. If they hear that and still want to go for it, fine, but I seriously question whether a 22-year-old is hearing that or whether the J-schools are lining their own pockets with these kids' misguided dreams. And if you think my version is a trope, then you have been spending way more time in an ivory tower than in a newsroom the past 10 years.

I also know people who lack one of your three necessary ingredients. But I know a lot who have them all and it doesn't matter.

Just remember what your position is advocating.

Let the untalented and lazy take over the industry (insert punchline about how they already have here) because no one encourages the talented and dogged to enter it.

See what kind of country we have then.

You inserted my punchline, dammit! :)

I can see you're coming at it from the academic side, which is always more idealistic. I accept that and I understand your POV. I just hope you're mixing in some reality so kids don't get to be 32 and wonder WTF JackS was talking about with all the riches that await. It seems like journalism is one field that stands out for its graduates not knowing or caring about the financial picture.
 
I may have more of an academic point of view than people who have no connection to academia, but I assure you I still spend WAY more time in the trenches than in the ivory tower.

They don't let adjuncts in the tower. ;)
 
JackS said:
I may have more of an academic point of view than people who have no connection to academia, but I assure you I still spend WAY more time in the trenches than in the ivory tower.

They don't let adjuncts in the tower. ;)

Your point about "anyone being able to thrive" in journalism shows you don't know much about the trenches.

I did laugh when I saw your post about being in the business for 25 years, though, because I knew someone would misread it and think you were 25.

I guess in addition to not doing math, some journalists don't read well, either.
 
MartinonMTV2 said:
JackS said:
I may have more of an academic point of view than people who have no connection to academia, but I assure you I still spend WAY more time in the trenches than in the ivory tower.

They don't let adjuncts in the tower. ;)

Your point about "anyone being able to thrive" in journalism shows you don't know much about the trenches.

I did laugh when I saw your post about being in the business for 25 years, though, because I knew someone would misread it and think you were 25.

I guess in addition to not doing math, some journalists don't read well, either.

Obviously, because never in this thread did I write "anyone" could thrive in journalism. In fact, I've gone out of my way to say I don't think that's the case. My exact words were:

...if you're talented, persistent and FLEXIBLE, you can survive and even thrive.
 
Let me guess: Flexible, meaning you'll work anywhere, even some remote outpost for who knows how long.

Persistent, meaning you'll keep doing it without thinking about why, even for free.

Sorry, but your type of advice is a huge reason why the "profession" is in serious trouble.
 
JackS said:
LongTimeListener said:
You are showing why people laugh when journalists try to do math. Just look at the numbers. You know, Brian Williams made a good living too, but that doesn't mean broadcast journalism was a great field to enter in the 1990s. This is the same thing.

And yes, I think everyone, particularly in a J-school, should be discouraged from entering. That is, they should be told that what awaits them is an extremely flooded pool of candidates and a likelihood that they will never make enough money to support themselves and a family. If they hear that and still want to go for it, fine, but I seriously question whether a 22-year-old is hearing that or whether the J-schools are lining their own pockets with these kids' misguided dreams. And if you think my version is a trope, then you have been spending way more time in an ivory tower than in a newsroom the past 10 years.

I also know people who lack one of your three necessary ingredients. But I know a lot who have them all and it doesn't matter.

Just remember what your position is advocating.

Let the untalented and lazy take over the industry (insert punchline about how they already have here) because no one encourages the talented and dogged to enter it.

See what kind of country we have then.

Ah, it's the "You must hate America!" argument.

Tell you what: As soon as you uproot the philosophy that people don't or won't read and that it's pointless to spend time digging into issues because "no one cares," then you can toss this one out. Until then, it's silly.
 
It's also in trouble because people are too easily convinced it's preferable to complain than try to do something about it. There's a middle ground between "Follow your dreams an everything will work out" and "I can't get ahead, so **** it."
 

Latest posts

Back
Top