Colton said:
I should do what Spnited suggests and STFU.
Thanks for setting me straight, Oldtimer.
Colton, no one is saying you don't have the right to be pissed, but seriously, what good does a thread like this do? They all begin and end the same way.
-- Are there going to be furloughs? Cue bitching and moaning. XXXX company is evil.
-- Seventy-five percent of the time? Yes there are going to be furloughs.
-- Cue more bitching and moaning to point of a dead horse beating. XXXX company is still evil. Wash, rinse, repeat.
Oh ... and in the end? All of the bitching in the world doesn't change a damn thing. Depressing as hell? Yes. But message board bravado doesn't mean jack **** in the real world.
No one has to be told that furloughs suck. No one has to be reminded that many of the companies currently stewarding our product have some major issues, CNHI among them, but by no means the only company in the gang. See Gannett, McClatchy, Tribune, MediaGeneral, et ****ing al. The grass isn't greener anywhere else, it's all pretty ****ing brown right now.
It's why I take a dim view at those who ***** and moan about XXX company without having worked for or considered the experiences of those who worked at several. Like Mizzou said, Gannett has had an equal amount of furlough days over less time than CNHI has.
It just seems to be that there's no purpose served in hemming and hawing over something that hasn't even happened yet. Why get everyone worked up? It's not like anyone at CNHI needs a reminder that they might have furloughs again.