Joe Williams said:Which is better way to go, Ballard's book or Simmons' book?
Hoo said:Joe Williams said:Which is better way to go, Ballard's book or Simmons' book?
I purchased both books and started with Simmons. I like him. But to be honest, if Ballard's book is half the intelligent, insightful examination the blurbs say it is -- and Ballard's history suggests -- I can't imagine it's not the better choice. Simmons' book, from what I've read so far, has some good analysis but is painfully (and predictably) indulgent and desperately in need of editing.
Joe Williams said:Hoo said:Joe Williams said:Which is better way to go, Ballard's book or Simmons' book?
I purchased both books and started with Simmons. I like him. But to be honest, if Ballard's book is half the intelligent, insightful examination the blurbs say it is -- and Ballard's history suggests -- I can't imagine it's not the better choice. Simmons' book, from what I've read so far, has some good analysis but is painfully (and predictably) indulgent and desperately in need of editing.
Thanks, Hoo, sounds like order in which I should tackle them.
Hoo said:Joe Williams said:Hoo said:Joe Williams said:Which is better way to go, Ballard's book or Simmons' book?
I purchased both books and started with Simmons. I like him. But to be honest, if Ballard's book is half the intelligent, insightful examination the blurbs say it is -- and Ballard's history suggests -- I can't imagine it's not the better choice. Simmons' book, from what I've read so far, has some good analysis but is painfully (and predictably) indulgent and desperately in need of editing.
Thanks, Hoo, sounds like order in which I should tackle them.
I finished Ballard's book over Thanksgiving and liked it a lot. If you love the game of basketball, you should read it. You'll probably learn a lot about the game's intricacies -- or at least the details on how the world's best players work.