DemoChristian said:Boom_70 said:A redneck would protect the Constitution and have the guts to stand up to the people who want to take God out of public life in America.
I'm putting the over/under on the number of times Charlie Daniels has read the Constitution at one. I'll take the under.
joe_schmoe said:DemoChristian said:Boom_70 said:A redneck would protect the Constitution and have the guts to stand up to the people who want to take God out of public life in America.
I'm putting the over/under on the number of times Charlie Daniels has read the Constitution at one. I'll take the under.
I'd put it at 1 for everyone in this forum and take the under there too. I'm sure everyone has glanced at it and seen specific parts, but I doubt very many people in here have read it.
joe_schmoe said:DemoChristian said:Boom_70 said:A redneck would protect the Constitution and have the guts to stand up to the people who want to take God out of public life in America.
I'm putting the over/under on the number of times Charlie Daniels has read the Constitution at one. I'll take the under.
I'd put it at 1 for everyone in this forum and take the under there too. I'm sure everyone has glanced at it and seen specific parts, but I doubt very many people in here have read it.
pallister said:Daniels was a huge Jimmy Carter supporter. He's not a partisan hack, as many of those who condemn him are.
And you're sure of this because ... ?DemoChristian said:Boom_70 said:A redneck would protect the Constitution and have the guts to stand up to the people who want to take God out of public life in America.
I'm putting the over/under on the number of times Charlie Daniels has read the Constitution at one. I'll take the under.
Because people are trying to take God out of public life. The Constitution forbids the government from establishing a state religion. That's all it says. It says freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. But the ACLA would be happy if ever mention or hint of relgion in government and public life were removed completely. That's not what the Constitution says.DemoChristian said:I'm referring specifically to what he said in the sentence I quoted.
What in the Constitution says anything about the President being able to keep people from taking God out of public life?
I've read other rants by Charlie Daniels. I don't find him to be intelligent.
That is neither ignorant nor intolerant.
JR said:No, because he's dumb and sounds like a parody of a southern redneck. I don't have to know what he looks like and hear what he sounds like to know he's ignorant---not to mention dangerous.pallister said:Why do you think Charlie Daniels is dumb? Because you don't agree with him? Because he doesn't speak the way you like? Because you don't like the way he looks?
Please don't pull out Hondo's "the you don't agree with him" ****. He's not stupid because people disagree with him, he's stupid because well, he's stupid. This column could have been hauled straight from The Onion.
You've already had one dumb mother****er screwing up things in the world for the last eight years. Why would you want someone even dumber?
hondo said:Because people are trying to take God out of public life. The Constitution forbids the government from establishing a state religion. That's all it says. It says freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. But the ACLA would be happy if ever mention or hint of relgion in government and public life were removed completely. That's not what the Constitution says.DemoChristian said:I'm referring specifically to what he said in the sentence I quoted.
What in the Constitution says anything about the President being able to keep people from taking God out of public life?
I've read other rants by Charlie Daniels. I don't find him to be intelligent.
That is neither ignorant nor intolerant.
Maybe you're the one who needs a refresher course on the document.
hondo said:JR said:No, because he's dumb and sounds like a parody of a southern redneck. I don't have to know what he looks like and hear what he sounds like to know he's ignorant---not to mention dangerous.pallister said:Why do you think Charlie Daniels is dumb? Because you don't agree with him? Because he doesn't speak the way you like? Because you don't like the way he looks?
Please don't pull out Hondo's "the you don't agree with him" ****. He's not stupid because people disagree with him, he's stupid because well, he's stupid. This column could have been hauled straight from The Onion.
You've already had one dumb mother****er screwing up things in the world for the last eight years. Why would you want someone even dumber?
Bull****, bull**** and bull****. You think he's dumb and dangerous because of his views...which is dumb and dangerous.
Bubbler said:Is it too late for ask who gives a **** what Charlie Daniels thinks?
And in the interest of equal time, if there's liberal Charlie Daniels in a parallel universe, I don't care what he thinks either.
And now, in the interest of equal time, we present:
http://www.****thesouth.com/
pallister said:And now, in the interest of equal time, we present:
http://www.****thesouth.com/
Equal time? Hell, this is just another thread where a bunch of bigots talk about how smart they are and how dumb anyone from the South is.