Bring on Iran!

  • Thread starter Thread starter wickedwritah
  • Start date Start date
Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

W

wickedwritah

Guest
Brit Hume labeling as "ignorant" anyone who says we don't nuke Iran (in reference to Obama) ... it scares me.

"We're winning in Iraq" -- Bill Kristol.

Semi-scary.
 
They're pandering, slavering idiots, speaking to their own kind.

The evidence belies the bull****.
 
Still had the TV on Fox after last night's rout.

I turn it on, and I land smack-dab in the middle of that show, with Juan Williams seemingly the token sense-talker on that panel.
 
wicked said:
Still had the TV on Fox after last night's rout.

I turn it on, and I land smack-dab in the middle of that show, with Juan Williams seemingly the token sense-talker on that panel.
Now wait a minute. I thought Williams lost all credibility with the left when he defended O'Reilly. How can he suddenly be a "sense-talker" again?
 
wicked said:
Brit Hume labeling as "ignorant" anyone who says we don't nuke Iran

What does this sentence mean?

-- Anyone who says we won't nuke Iran is ignorant?
-- Anyone who says we shouldn't nuke Iran is ignorant?
-- Is nuke short-hand for "go to war with," or does he really mean nuke?
-- Is he saying we should just do it now, or if this or if that?
 
warmustcontinuelolcat.jpg
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
The words of the generals and soldiers who have been on the ground are good enough for me.

The fact that Bill Kristol -- after being proven spectacularly wrong, time and again, on Iraq since 2003 -- is allowed within 50 miles of a television studio pretty much sums up the state of political journalism in this country.

Bill ****ing Kristol. Jesus Christ.

As for Iran, too bad our administration blew the cover of a CIA agent whose job was to prevent Tehran from getting nukes.
 
HejiraHenry said:
wicked said:
"We're winning in Iraq" -- Bill Kristol.

Okay, prove we're not.

Links to Mediamatters.com or MoveOn.org aren't acceptable proof.


Cost to America so far: $462,000,000,000

http://www.nationalpriorities.org/Cost-of-War/Cost-of-War-3.html

American military casualties:

3872 Dead
27,000 Wounded

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iraq_casualties.htm

Iraqi Casualties:

Low estimate: 75,000

High estimate: 650,000

http://www.iraqbodycount.org/

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/10/11/iraq.deaths/

Iraqis displaced by war:

2 million internally

2 million fled to surrounding countries

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19055852/


Again, please define "winning."
 
old_tony said:
wicked said:
Still had the TV on Fox after last night's rout.

I turn it on, and I land smack-dab in the middle of that show, with Juan Williams seemingly the token sense-talker on that panel.
Now wait a minute. I thought Williams lost all credibility with the left when he defended O'Reilly. How can he suddenly be a "sense-talker" again?

Sorry, I'm not on the left, believe it or not.
 
We will be greeted as liberators.

We're winning the war with Eurasia.

We've always been wining the war with Eurasia.
 
We're winning because we haven't admitted we lost. The only way to lose is to stop fighting. We're winning, because we have to win.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top