accguy said:For the record, it didn't say the paper wasn't putting information about Northeastern in the paper, they just weren't staffing games.
I don't know that I totally blame them. In a market where there are more stories than resources, wouldn't it make sense to go where people are a bit happier to see you?
Stitch said:http://www.huntington-news.com/news/boston-herald-boycotts-huskies-1.2159653
A boycott like this seems silly. Shouldn't the beat writers have known about the presser?
clutchcargo said:I, too, find it humorous that the Northeastern muckety-muck referred to the press conference announcing the demise of the football prorgam as a "success."
My guess is that the sour grapes came about when Boston Globe scooped the Herald on the news 2-3 days earlier. It's the old, "If we get beat on a story, we're going to pretend for a few days that it didn't happen."
KP said:More people cared about the program getting cut than when it was actually around.
And why wait a week to hold a press conference. Nothing like waiting before explaining the decision and having to answer for your decisions.